Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />I. Statement of the Issues Presented for Review ............................................................................. 2 <br />II. Statement of t'le Case and Interest of Amici .............................................................................. 2 <br />III. Summary of .4rgument ....................................:......................................................................... 9 <br />IV. Argurrient ................................................................................................................................ 10 <br />A. The Water Court's Decision is Contrary to the Intent and Pu.rpose of <br />Senate Bi11216 ............................................................................................................ 10 <br />B. The Water Court's Refusal to Limit the RICD is Contrary tc> Long- <br />Established Water Law Principles . ............................................................................. 15 <br />C. Nothing in the Colorado Constitution Prevents the Water Court from <br />Limiting the Amount of Water Granted for an RICD ................................................. 17 <br />V. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 22 <br />i