Laserfiche WebLink
were rebutted should not be disturbed so long as the court's fimdi,ngs are supporte;d by evidence <br />on the record, Hay??tack Ranch, LLC v Fazzio, 997 P.2d 548, 555 (Colo. 2000), ??nd this Court is <br />obligated to search the record for evidence supporting the triai court's determination. See <br />Simpson v. Ya1e vrvs.; 886 P.2d 689, 698 (Colo. 1994); Peterson v. Grand Wate.r Comm'n, <br />195 Colo. 508, 5145, 579 P.2d 629, 634 (1978). <br />V. CONCLUSION <br />For the foregoing reasons, .Amici Northwest Colorado Council of Govetnments et al. <br />request that this Court affirm in its entirety the water court's decree awazding conditional and <br />absolute water rights for the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy Distrirt's kayak course <br />under the existing principles of Colorado water law. <br />Respectfully submitted this 29th da.y of September, 2004. <br />22