Laserfiche WebLink
Supreme Court, State of Colorado (Appeal from District Court, Water Division No. 4, Case No. 02CW38) <br />Case No. 04SA44: Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District <br />Answer Brief of the Colorado River Water Conservation District <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />Page <br />D. SB 216 contemplates that the Findings of Fact issued by the CWCB <br />are rebuttable by a preponderance of the evidence and that the <br />CWCB's Recommendations are not entitled to any presumptive <br />validity .......................................................17 <br />1. SB 216 provides the CWCB with the authority to make <br />presumptively valid findings only on certain limited <br />factualissues ................................................17 <br />2. A preponderance of the evidence is the correct burden to <br />rebut the CWCB's Findings of Fact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 <br />3. Sufficient evidence was presented at trial to overcome any <br />presumption of validity on the matters delegated to the <br />CWCB ....................................................18 <br />V. CONCLUSION .......................................................20 <br />-ii-