My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CWCB Concerning the Application for Water Rights of Upper Gunnsion River Water Conservancy District Transcript
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
CWCB Concerning the Application for Water Rights of Upper Gunnsion River Water Conservancy District Transcript
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:36 PM
Creation date
7/28/2009 2:38:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.2A5
Description
Staff Recommendations, Board Memo
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
9/10/2002
Author
CWCB, Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District
Title
CWCB Concerning the Application for Water Rights of Upper Gunnsion River Water Conservancy District Transcript
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Woman: <br />Don Schwin.dt: <br />[unmtelligible] do we have a big version of it?. Oh I tbink it's <br />actually sitting right here. <br />You had a question, Eric? <br />Eric WiIkinson: I just have a couple. You had made a refereaee to a County-owned <br />water plant. And I didn't - in the aFaa of the recreational <br />[i,mintelligible] diversion. Cou1d yau #lesh that out a little brt? Any <br />rela.tionship to the use in. tbis azea or - y referenced that and I didn't <br />catch this - the significaztce of that. . <br />John DeVore: 1XTeIl it's [unmtelligrble] was there's two ways that we acquue <br />propert.y in_the area. One was thraugh the F'AA and the other was <br />acquisition o€land to liuild imdustrial water plant. When you're on <br />site, the old log structure is a storage building foi the plant aad the <br />feaced-in area is the water treatnient plazrt. <br />Eric Wilkinson: 'Ths other question that Y had was it sounds, sihze 1996, that you <br />have intended to build this as an ameuity for the community. Anct <br />you ba.ve decided in 2002 to go out and get the water rights for it to <br />protect it- Is tbat a fair representation7 Was it going to be built <br />anyway, prior to Sena#e BM 216? <br />John DeVore; Yes, yes. <br />Don Schwindt: QK. <br />Harold Mtskel:, ? 4ne more? ' <br />Don Schvvindt: .. One more from HazokL . ? <br />Hazold MiskeL- Mr. DeVore, you said that you found oz the Cotmty found that there <br />is a side-benefit from this, and that is itnproved fish habitat: <br />3ohn DeVore: . Um hum [affrmative response] <br />Harold 11Xiskel: Ha.ve there been any studies done ta confinn t]3at? <br />John DeVore: ' . What Gazy has indicated #o us is that in other whitewater parlcs that <br />bave been bu'lt, what it does is it creates back=eddies. And rt dbes <br />. enhance fish habitats. In fact, that's - our 404 permit doest't xdally <br />_ reference, all right we have a 444 permit for a whitewater gark but <br />it's more of a- it does reference it's a nationat permit uader ha.bitat <br />huprovement. . . <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />September la, 2002 Hearing Transcript <br />Page 23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.