Laserfiche WebLink
Upper Gunnison lZiver Water Conservancy L?istrict <br />Case No. 02CW038 <br />]?age 2 <br />1. The above-captioned case was tried in the Water C;ourt, Water Division No. 4, from <br />September 15 - 19, 2003. The Court's decree was entered December 26, 2003, and CWCB and the <br />Engineers appealed. Following entry of the Supreme Court's ruling in Colorado Water <br />Consey-vation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservaracy District, 109 P.3d 585 (Colo. <br />2005) on March 14, 2005, the matter was remanded to the Water Court , with instructions to remand <br />to the CWCB for revised findings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion. In addition, the <br />water court was directed to make a determination that the water right sought by the District meets <br />the definition of a"recreational in-channel diversion" pursuant to C.R.S. § 39-92-103(10.3). <br />2. The District, CWCB and the Engineers have reached a settlement in this matte;r that <br />eliminates the need for further proceedings before CWCB. Pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-102(6)(a), <br />the CWCB recommends that the water court grant the application for recreational in-channel <br />diversion water rights, subject to the terms and conditions of the proposed decree attached hereto as <br />Exhibit A, which exhibit is incorporated herein by this reference. For purposes of settlement of this <br />case only, CWCB makes the following findings as required by C.R.S. § 37-92-102(6)(b): (n the <br />adjudication and administration of the recreational in-channel diversion claimed herein, subject to <br />the terms and conditions of the proposed decree in attached Exhibit A, will not impair the ability of <br />Colorado to fully develop and place to consumptive beneficial use its compact entitlements; (I[) the <br />stream reach is appropriate for the intended use of the recreational in-channel diversion claimed <br />herein; (III) there is access for recreational in-channel use of the recreational in-channel diversion <br />claimed herein; (N) exercise of the recreational in-channel diversion claimed herein will not r,ause <br />material inj ury to instream flow water rights appropriated pursuant to C.R. S. § 37-92-102(3) anci (4); <br />and (V) adjudication and administration of the recreational in-channel diversion claimed he-.rein, <br />subject to the terms and conditions of the proposed decree in attached Exhibit A, will promote <br />maximum utilization of waters of the state of Colorado as referenced in paragraph (a) of C.R.S. § <br />37-92-102(1) or as discussed in broader terms in case law. The CWCB hereby reports these finclings <br />to the water court for review pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-305(13). <br />3. The foregoing recommendation and findings (1) are made as a settleinent and <br />compromise of this case; (2) are unique to the Gunnison River and Gunnison River basin and the <br />location of this recreational in-channel diversion; and (3) are not precedent for or binding upori the <br />CWCB in any other case not involving this particular recreational in-channel diversion. <br />4. The CWCB and Engineers hereby stipulate to entry of a decree herein in the form <br />attached hereto as Exhibit A, or other form that is no less restrictive upon the District than the <br />proposed decree attached as Exhibit A, and agree that, upon entry of the decree by the Water Court, <br />Water Division No. 4, they will be bound by said decree. <br />5. The District agrees that it will not seelc a decree with terms and conditions that are <br />inconsistent with this Stipulation and Agreement, and that upon entry of the decree herein, the <br />District will be bound by said decree. The CWCB and Engineers shall remain on the mailing list in