Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IN THE UNITED ST.4TES DISTRICT COURT <br />FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLOR?DO - <br />U13ITED ST.,TES OF AMERICA v. NOR^fiERN <br />COLORt'.DO W:.TER CONSBRVA;VC7 D1S^7ICT, <br />et ul., <br />IN = MATTER OF TfE ADJUDIC ;T'?Ci4 Or <br />PRIORITIES OF 41."TER P.IGHTS IN 'W^TER <br />DISTRICT N0. 36 FOR PURPaSE3 OF <br />IRRIG:.TION <br />) CONSQLZDATED CAa^ES <br />? - <br />) CIVM N0. 2782 <br />) . <br />) - <br />) <br />) CIVZ N0. 5016 <br />PETITIONERS: THE COLGRADO RIVER '.?'??'ER ; <br />CONSERVATION DISTRICT, THE GRAND 7:;LLEY; <br />WATER USERS ASSOCIATION, ORCH:+RD N'?',.St: IRRIGATION DISTRICT, PALIS.0.DE IARIGA- ' <br />TION DISTRICT AND GRAND VALLEY IRRIGF,- ' <br />TIOI3 COMPANY ; <br />IN 2'fE MATTER OF THE ADJIIDICATION QP <br />YRIORITIES OF WA'iER RIGHTS IN WATER <br />DZSTRICT NO. 36 FOR PURPOSES OTHER <br />THAN IlRRIGATION <br />PETZTIONERS: THE COLORADO RIVER WhTER ) <br />CONSERVATION DISTRICT, THE GRAND VALLEY) <br />WATER USERS ASSQCI:iTION, QRCHARD MESa ) <br />IRRIGATION DISTRICT, P;aLISADE IRRIGA- ) <br />TION DISTRICT A.ND GR4ND VALLEY IRRIGA- ) <br />TION COMPANY ) <br />at%enr ncnoVn <br />CIVII, N0. 5017 <br />This matter having come on for trial, both oral and <br />documentary evidence having been adduced by the United States - <br />of America in snpport oP its clai^sed rights to the use of <br />water for the Coiorado-Big Thompson Pro„ect in the Colorado . <br />River and its tributaries, including the Blue River and its <br />trihutaries, 411th a priority date of August 1, 1935 and the <br />parties named in this Final Decree lzaving expressly stipu- <br />lated and agreed that the United States o1' Arerica 3s entitled <br />to have a priority date of August 1, 19355, and the.City and <br />County of Denver and the City of Colorado Springs having ad- <br />duced evidence showing their priorit3es as herein provided, <br />a1.2 as set forth in the Findings of Fact and Conclusions oi <br />- 7- - <br />DWD EXHIBIT 2