My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Prehearing Statement of Colorado River Water Conservation District
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Prehearing Statement of Colorado River Water Conservation District
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:25 PM
Creation date
7/27/2009 10:50:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.51A2
Description
Objectors' Prehearing Statement
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/17/2005
Author
Peter C. Fleming, Steven M. Mathis, William C. Wallace, Taylor Hawes, Boyle Engineering Corporation
Title
Prehearing Statement of Colorado River Water Conservation District
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BEFORE THE COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />PREHEARING STATEMENT OF COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION <br />DISTRICT <br />CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS FOR A RECREATIONAL IN- <br />CHANNEL DIVERSION OF THE TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE IN SUMMIT COUNTY <br />The Colorado River Water Conservation District (hereinafter "River District") hereby <br />submits its Prehearing Statement for the Hearing on July 20, 2005, before the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board ("CWCB") regarding the Town of Silverthorne's application for a <br />Recreational In-Channel Diversion water right ("RICD"). <br />1. INTRODUCTION <br />The River District's primary concern in Silverthorne's RICD application is to ensure that <br />the adjudication and administration of the RICD will not interfere with the maximum utilization of <br />waters in the State. See Section 37-92-102(6)(b)(V), C.R.S. and RICD Rules, Section 7(e). <br />Section 37-92-102(6)(b)(V) states that the CWCB must determine whether the "adjudication and <br />administration of the RICD would promote maximum utilization of the waters of the State." The <br />River District is involved in several proposed projects that may help meet future water demands <br />and wants to ensure that the Silverthorne RICD will not interfere with those projects. The River <br />District's concerns are set forth in the written testimony of David Merritt, Chief Engineer for the <br />River District, and are summarized herein. <br />II. PROPOSED PROJECTS TO MEET FUTURE WATER DEMANDS <br />The Upper Colorado River Project Study ("UPCO") Report, dated May 29, 2003, <br />highlighted the fact that by the year 2030, existing supplies would not satisfy future demands in <br />Summit and Grand Counties. See Exhibit B. The River District is currently involved in several <br />projects that could help reduce these expected shortages and these projects could be impacted by <br />the proposed RICD. Descriptions of those projects and the River District's concerns are listed <br />below. <br />A. Old Dillon Reservoir Enlargement <br />The River District, through its Colorado River Water Projects Enterprise ("Enterprise"), <br />entered into an intergovernmental agreement ("IGA") with Summit County to perform feasibility <br />analysis, project design and construction of the Old Dillon Reservoir First Enlargement ("Old <br />Dillon Enlargement"). The rights proposed to be used for the Old Dillon Enlargement above are <br />senior to Silverthorne's claimed RICD; however, changes of water rights or new exchanges may be <br />necessary to maximize the use of the Old Dillon Enlargement. The River District is concerned that <br />Silverthorne's RICD could interfere with the ability of the Old Dillon Enlargement participants to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.