My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Prehearing Statement of the Town of Silverton
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Prehearing Statement of the Town of Silverton
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:25 PM
Creation date
7/27/2009 10:35:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.51A1a
Description
Applicant's Prehearing Statements: Legal Documents
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/6/2005
Author
David W. Robbins, Mark J. Wagner
Title
Prehearing Statement of the Town of Silverton
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br />The Whitewater Course will have a minimum boatable flow rate of 100 cfs. Water at <br />this flow rate will be controlled and diverted throughout the Whitewater Course and will not be <br />wasted. The minimum boatable flow rate for which the Whitewater Course will be designed (100 <br />cfs) is based on basic hydraulic formulas coupled with a working knowledge of this segment of <br />the Blue River and its characteristics. The structures that will create the minimum boatable <br />flows will be hydraulically and structurally sound, with anchors into the bed and banks of the <br />river with large stone and concrete. I can provide more detail regarding design information if <br />necessary. <br />Fiood impacts <br />At flows above 1200 cfs the structures will continue to create a hydraulic and contain the <br />flow, but the play feature will become less significant until the structure will be overtopped. <br />When the structure is overtopped the feature will not affect the floodway and will not affect the <br />100-year floodplain. Numerous HEC-RAS models of similar structures in similar rivers have <br />shown that these structures do not create a flood hazard. <br />Similar Projects <br />? Many of the conclusions reached in this report are based on past experiences at similar <br />projects. 5imilar modifications have been made at a number of boating parks including Vail, <br />Golden, Boulder, Gunnison and Salida. These existing designs verify several key claims made <br />by this report. <br />Primarily these courses validate the fact that these courses see increased use at increased <br />flow rates. Vail, Golden and Salida host major freestyle events during peak run-off season. <br />These events often attract thousands of spectators and have a significant effect on the local <br />community's economy. The courses also see vastly increased traffic at higher levels outside of <br />competition dates. This traffic is attributed to boaters and onlookers that are interested in the <br />more dynamic moves that are possible at higher flow rates. Furthermore the courses are used at <br />low flow for lower, mid-level and local boating. These boaters often sharpen their skills at these <br />lower flows. <br />Secondly, the existing courses verify the design functionality. In all of these courses the <br />flow is diverted and controlled to create desirable recreational in-stream features. The size, <br />power and definition of the features is also observed to increase at increased flow rates. <br />Lastly, these courses verify the viability of a whitewater/boating park. Whitewater sport <br />is one of the fastest growing sports in the country and events held at similar parks have <br />significant effects on the local economy. The benefits of a whitewater/boating park include not <br />only the increased flow of boaters to the area but an increased flow of tourists and spectators. <br />• <br />-10-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.