Laserfiche WebLink
Stipulation for Decree have agreed not to oppose the entry of <br />this Decree or have agreed to withdraw their Statements of - <br />Opposition by means of various stipulations or other pleadings. <br />The Court having reviewed the various pleadings and havinq <br />reviewed and approved all of the various stipulations in this <br />case, FINDS as follows: <br />l. The provisions proposed in the Stipulation for Decree <br />and proposed decree to govern the administration of the water <br />rights owned by the United States and used for the operation of <br />the Colorado-Big Thompson Project which are evidenced by <br />paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Final Decree entered in these <br />Consolidated Cases on October 12, 1955 are consistent with that <br />Decree and with the operation of the Colorado-Big Thompson <br />Project in accordance with the intent of Senate Document No. 80, <br />75th Cong. lst Sess., and in conformity with applicable federal <br />and Colorado law. <br />2. Denver does not here seek to adjudicate an <br />appropriative right of exchange between Williams Fork Reservoir <br />and the Harold D. Roberts Tunnel or Dillon'Reservoir. Instead, <br />Denver claims ta make such exchanges by the exercise of the right <br />decreed to its Williams Fork Reservoir after complying with the <br />requirements of paragraph 4(c) in the 1955 Stipulation and <br />paragraphs 2 and 5 of the 1964 Decree in the Consolidated Cases. <br />3