Laserfiche WebLink
Consolidated Civil Case <br />Nos. 2782, 5016 and 5017 ayid <br />Case No. 91CW252, WD 5 <br />reached eleva--ion 7482 feet, and of the release of the <br />substitution flows at the designated xate. <br />37.2 At an;? time prior to the expiration of the <br />original period of such retained jurisdiction or any extension <br />thereof which may be ordered by the Water Judge under Section <br />37-92-304(6), 15 C.R.S. (1990), any Opposer may invoke the <br />water Court's jurisdiction by filing'a verified petition with <br />the Clerk of r_he water Court with copies to the Co-Applicants. <br />The petition to invoke retained jurisdiction and to modify the <br />decree shall set rorth with particularity the factual basis <br />upon which the requested reconsideration is premised, together <br />with proposed decretal language to implement the petition. The <br />party Iodging the petition shall have the burden of going <br />forward to establish the prima Lacie facts alleged in the <br />petition. If the court finds those facts to be established, <br />the Co-Applicants snall thereupon have the burden of proof to <br />show: (a) that any modification sought by the Co-AppZicants <br />will avoid injury to other appropriators, or (b) that any <br />modification sought by Opposers is not required to avoid injury <br />to other appropriators, or (c) that any term or condition <br />proposed by Co-Applicants in response to the Opposers` petition <br />does avoid injury --o other appropriators. <br />37.3 The Court may, after consideration ot the petition <br />and responses r_hereto, together with the evidence presented, <br />allow the part:.es z3 propose furthe= terms and conditions which <br />33