Laserfiche WebLink
• The flood bulletins are weekly forecasts with daily updates. They are produced from <br />May through September. <br />• Bill Badini is a contact at HDR for the flood threat bulletins. Riverside should coordinate <br />collecting flood outlook products with Kevin Houck. The spatial data in the bulletins <br />should be available in GIS format. <br />County Data Collection <br />AMEC will contact counties and local governments in order to determine types of flood <br />hazard data available, and the process to obtain these data: <br />• AMEC's focus is on collecting flood hazard data from counties/local government. <br />• AMEC will request from CWCB contact information for county representatives known <br />by CWCB to be flood data `keyholders', including local government managers, CASFM <br />members (CFMs), emergency managers, floodplain managers, and GIS managers. <br />• AMEC will develop a Data Collection Questionnaire to distribute to counties. This <br />questionnaire will assist counties understand the type and form of data we are searching <br />for and allow us to document contact with and response from counties. CWCB expressed <br />interest in reviewing and contributing to a draft form of the questionnaire. AMEC will <br />circulate the questionnaire to CWCB and Riverside for input prior to distribution to <br />counties. <br />• AMEC will gather information on'data update frequency', i.e. the regularity with which <br />an agency updates data. A request for this information will be included in the <br />questionnaire. <br />• CWCB currently has no plan for how to update data sources or how often. As the project <br />moves ahead, AMEC will provide the state with recommendations for how the data <br />update process might be simplified for CWCB. <br />• CWCB agreed AMEC should begin contacting local government entities prior to <br />completion of the user / stakeholder assessment interviews. <br />• CWCB will contact counties (probably via CASFM) to introduce the Flood DSS project <br />as a `news item' in early June 2009. This will allow local government staff to feel more <br />comfortable with the data requests because they would have heard about the project. <br />• AMEC will develop a list (and map) that prioritizes data collection at the county level <br />and shows data collection progress over time. <br />• AMEC will develop a list of six representative counties on which to focus initial data <br />collection efforts. Once AMEC have put in a sustained effort on collecting from these <br />counties (~1.5 months) they will report details of the data and data collection experience <br />so the project team understands the likely issues we can anticipate for remaining counties, <br />as well as view the data we can anticipate collecting statewide. <br />A number of focused points, issues, and directions, as well as more general comments, were <br />raised during the discussion on data collection: <br />While the DNR projection datum is NAD83 Zone 13 N, Carolyn indicated we could use <br />Geographic WGS84 to improve web performance. <br />