Laserfiche WebLink
Leaf <br />channels; however, the "self-formang" processe-s in <br />each reach are limited in large part by the irifluence <br />of rock outcrops, boulders, and streamside foressts <br />which form steps and maintain channel stability. <br />GEOMORPHIC THRESHOLDS <br />An understanding of the concept of geornorphic <br />threshold is important in evaluating channel mainte- <br />nance flow requirements. Simply put, this conr.ept <br />recognizes that most streams will remain stable with- <br />in a range of hydrologic conditions and sediment <br />inputs. Channel stability, i.e, the magnitude of this <br />range can be implicitly evaluated using the pi•ocedure <br />developed by Pfankuch (1975). Also, as previously dis- <br />cussed, a comprehensive quantification procedure for <br />determining the magnitude of change in hydro]ogy <br />and/or sediment sources and supply is available in the <br />chapters of WR,ENSS previously mentionedl. Ot;her <br />engineering procedures such as Meyer-Peter-Muller <br />(1948) can be used where applicable for deterrnining a <br />stream's ability to transport bedload sedimer.it under <br />a particular flow regime. <br />OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS <br />In this discussion a channel maintenancE: flow is <br />that flow regime necessary to move sedime:nt "over <br />the long haul" in a given stream reach. Quantification <br />of this flow regime requires an evaluation of the local <br />hydrology, sediment sources and yields, channel pro- <br />cesses, and the inherent stability of the stream chan- <br />nel. Then, the problem becomes one of a site specific <br />evaluation of how much change in hydrology, sedi- <br />ment sources and yield, and baseline flow regrime the <br />channel can tolerate without excessive or accelerated <br />changes in channel geometry and rates of lateral <br />migration. <br />In self-formed channels, at least bankfull flows <br />must occur often enough to transport the quantity <br />and maximum size of the bedload sediment (Leopold <br />et al., 1964). In channels where morphology is not <br />entirely determined by flow (as in step-pool c;hannels <br />for example) the required maximum discharge is not <br />well known. For such channels, a channel mainte- <br />nance flow regime appears to be necessary only where <br />introduced sediment sources contribute significantly <br />to yield. <br />The proposed criteria for determining an opera- <br />tional channel maintenance flow regime consist;s of <br />two important components: <br />(1) Only flows equal to or greater than "bankfull <br />discharge" are utilized to move the required amount <br />and sizes of bedload sediment. These flows should be <br />allowed to occur on average at least once each 1.5 to 3 <br />years. Actual amounts and timing of flow occurrences <br />will depend on site specific monitoring of sediment <br />buildup and potential channel instability. However, in <br />all stream systems, the required discharge will be <br />that needed to move introduced sediment if any. <br />(2) The flows above must transport the average <br />annual yield of sediment from all sources over the <br />long term (say 25 to 50+ years). <br />In dry years, for example, when the duration of <br />flows greater than or equal to bankfull are short or <br />non-existent, the mean annual bedload sediment yield <br />may not be transported that year. In this case, sedi- <br />ment derived from introduced sources will be stored <br />in the channel. That sediment which is stored in the <br />channel must be transported during subsequent high <br />runoff years when the duration of bankfull or greater <br />flows is adequate to move the stored sediment plus <br />the average annual sediment yield for that year. <br />In summary, the proposed quantification of a chan- <br />nel maintenance flow regime involves an accounting <br />system based on site-specific evaluations of the <br />hydrology, sediment yield characteristics, and channel <br />processes. Example calculations which illustrate <br />application of these simple criteria follow. <br />EXAMPLE <br />A small storage reservoir and diversion project is <br />proposed at point B on the hypothetical Front Range <br />watershed shown in Figure 2. A preliminary channel <br />maintenance flow evaluation is required as part of the <br />feasibility study of the proposed project. <br />The drainage area upstream of the reservoir is <br />40.43 square miles of Alpine/Subalpine zone. The <br />lower basin downstream drains 40.44 square miles of <br />the Montane zone. The critical reach of channel <br />selected for channel maintenance flow evaluation is <br />some distance tlownstream from the reservoir at point <br />A. The channel at this location is a C3 mobile gravel <br />bed. Bankfull flow at point A is approximately 165 <br />c.f. s. <br />Average annual precipitation in the ]ower basin is <br />22 inches. Referring to Figure 1, this value corre- <br />sponds to an average annual bedload sediment yield <br />of approximately 41 tons/sq. mi. This amounts to <br />1,658 tons per year of bedload sediment transport in <br />the reach of channel between A and B. Of this total <br />baseline yield, it was conservatively estimated that <br />the stream must be capable of transporting at least <br />JAWRA 870 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION