My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Report on Water Yeild from Forest Management Letter
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
Report on Water Yeild from Forest Management Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:08 PM
Creation date
7/22/2009 12:46:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.250
Description
Water Issues
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/30/2000
Author
Melissa Kassen
Title
Report on Water Yeild from Forest Management Letter
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Correspondence
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the agency need not abandon its other legal duties in order to conduct a risky and, uItimately, <br />fn::tless experiment. <br />Logg,ing increases runoff. Removing 25-40°/a of a watershed's vegetation wiil substantially <br />increase sediment loads reaching i:he streams. Rhodes & Purser 1998, citing Dunne and <br />Leopold, 1978, USFS, 1980, Swanson, et al., 1987, Everest, et al., 1987; Geppert, et al., <br />1984; Everest et al, 1985; MacDonald and Ritiand, 1989; Platts et al, 1989; Hicks et al., <br />1991b. As runoff and erosion increase, large amounts of sediments and nutrients wash into <br />lakes and rivers. Excess sedimenl:s de:grade waterbodies and impair beneficial uses (Waters <br />1995). <br />• Logging increases stream channel erosion. "Increases in peakflow will increase channel <br />erosion via channel expansion anci chsinnei extension." Rhodes & Purser 1998, citing studies <br />on the effects of logging in Oregcin (I)ose and Roper, 1994), Idaho (King 1989), and - <br />snowmelt dominated azeas of Ari:zona (Heede, 1991). Channel form is determined by the <br />flow regime, the characteristics o:f secliment moving through the channel, and bed and bank <br />materials (Brookes 1996). Channel stability depends on factors such as channel dimension in <br />relation to flow•velocity, the roug;hness of channel materials, sediment load, and sediment <br />particle sizes. When one or more: of these characteristics is altered such that the stream is <br />unable to dissipate the energy of rtreamflow, increased channel erosion and channel incision <br />result. The increase in runoff volume: from logging can force sediments too rapidly through <br />the channel, scouring the river bmttom and disrugting habitat for bottom-dwelling organisms. <br />• Bv increasin$ sediment loads. los;ging...increases turbiditv. Water turbidity resulting from <br />sediment suspended in the water column has numerous effects on aquatic ecosystems <br />(Newcombe and MacDonald 1991). Turbidity reduces the light available for aquatic algae <br />and other primary producers to use ir.i photosynthesis. This decreases the production of <br />photosynthesizing plants that form the base of aquatic food webs. Turbidity also causes <br />stream invertebrates to increase their drifting movements downstream. This avoidance <br />response depletes local invertebr;ate popuiations and the insect food supply of foraging fish. <br />Laboratory and field experiments demonstrate a similar avoidance of turbid water by fish. <br />Turbidity limits fish vision, resulting in reduced feeding and growth. Suspended sediments <br />can also sett(e on the surfaces of fish gilis, impairing respiration. As a result, fish are <br />typically absent from stream reac;hes with high levels of suspended sediment. <br />Lo¢ging increases sediment devositi,Dn in streams bottoms. "Logging and logging roads <br />typically accelerate sediment delivery to streams on the order of two to ten times natural <br />rates." Rhodes & Purser, citing Geppert, et al., 1984 and MacDonald & Ritland, 1989. <br />EYCess deposited sediment has nnany negative effects on aquatic habitat and biota (Chapman <br />1988; Heede and Rinne 1990). ;5ediment deposits that fill spaces within larger cobble and <br />gravel substrates reduce habitat :For bottom dwelling invertebrates. If gravel and cobble are <br />completely embedded by fine sediments, invertebrate populations and the abundance of <br />invertebrate taxa available as food for fish can be greatly reduced. Embedding of spawning <br />gravel with sediments also inhibits fish reproduction (Bjornn and Reiser 1991). For example, <br />sediments can settle within salm.onici redds (gravel nests) and impede the flow of oxygenated <br />water to eggs. As a result, developing embryos and sac fry are unable to survive. Moreover, <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.