My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water Yield Enhancement
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Water Yield Enhancement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:04 PM
Creation date
7/21/2009 5:02:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.250
Description
Water Issues
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
7/12/2002
Author
Rick Cables, William P. Levere
Title
Water Yield Enhancement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-- In chaparral, evapotranspiration is often reduced by replacing deep-rooted species <br />with shallow rooted species. <br />-- Results of water yield studies are often reported as averages. This is misleading <br />because this average is made up of values that seldom center on average and the 50% <br />chance flow is often substantially less than the reported average. <br />-- Most research is based on comparisons of yield on paired watersheds of very small <br />size (most less than 1 miz in size nearly all less than 5 mi2 in size) with precise flow <br />measuring gages. <br />-- Experimental treatment regimes tend to be more extreme than conventional forest <br />management practices to assure measurable treahnent effects. <br />-- Persistent folklore coupled with a belief that reported averages represent commonly <br />achievable yields have lead to the belief that low flows are augmented more and that <br />high flows are relatively unaffected. This viewpoint is incorrect! <br />-- Studies by Hibbert in the 1980s suggest that the increase is a uniform percentage on <br />the hydrograph over the range of flows investigated. <br />-- This means, for example, that if low flows increase by approximately 15% for <br />significant treatments then it is likely that flood peaks also increase by 15%. <br />• In most water short areas, reservoirs are operated to maximize storage and are, thus, unable <br />to capture and store the significant yield increases associated with high runoff (flood) years. <br />-- In Arizona, for example, Brown and Fogel (1987) found that even with the substantial <br />number of dams in place, much of the yield increase was spilled because of reservoir <br />operational strategies. <br />• Extrapolating the small watershed studies to larger basins is problematic. <br />-- Larger basins have more practical limitations and resource coordination requirements. <br />-- The increases, while likely there, are not within our ability to detect on larger basins <br />of 10 mi2 and larger. <br />-- Exceptions might include insect killed forests and extensive fire and other natural <br />events that remove substantially all the forest cover at once. <br />• Treatments focused on water yield often result in compromising other resource values. <br />2. What is the science regarding water yield augmentation and what are the <br />expected average annual yield increases by forest types? <br />• Generally, forest harvest increases water yield and afforestation decreases water yield. <br />Deforestation reduces the amount of precipitation intercepted by vegetation, making more <br />water available for runoff into watercourses. <br />• Variability and uncertainty play a large role: <br />-- precipitation amount depends on annual and regional variations in climate
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.