My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Impact of Forest Service Activities on Stream Flow
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Impact of Forest Service Activities on Stream Flow
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:41:00 PM
Creation date
7/20/2009 11:44:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.250
Description
Water Issues
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
5/22/2003
Author
Charles A. Troendle, James M. Nankervis, Laurie S. Porth
Title
Impact of Forest Service Activities on Stream Flow
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Troendle/Nankervis/Port11 Page30 5/22/2003 <br />in the openings did in fac;t represent a significant increase in accumulation at the watershed level <br />(Troendle and King, 198:5) implying thei-e has been a significant reduction in winter interception <br />loss following timber harvest. More importantly, the increases in snow pack accumulation were a <br />significant part of the measured increase in stream flow. Troendle and King (1985) concluded <br />that the increases in snoiv pack accumulation observed to occur in the openings, and thought by <br />Hoover and Leaf (1965) to be due to reclistribution, actually reflected a reduction in what would <br />have been an interception loss. Troendle and King (1985) concluded the 23 percent average <br />increase in accumulatioii observed to coccur in the openings equated to an average 9 percent <br />increase in snow pack ac;cumulation on the entire watershed. Other watershed experiments (e.g. <br />Troendle and King 1987), plot studiies (Troendle and Meiman 1984,1986) and process <br />summaries (e.g. Meiman. 1987) further (iocumented that partial cutting could result in increased <br />stream flow through a reduction in ET that included a reduction in winter interception losses. <br />These observations were consistent wnth conclusions already reached by Wilm and Dunford <br />(1948) and others 40 yeass earlier. Intemeption theory replaced redistribntion theory as the basis <br />for interpreting the effect: that forest remi)val had on snow pack accumulation. <br />The WRENSS hydrology model (Troendle and Leaf 1980) was inrtially programmed for general <br />use by Swanson and Bernier (1986) and used by Swanson (1987) to simulate the effect of forest <br />management on water supply from subalpine forests. In the earlier report on "Estimating <br />Additional Water Yield From Changes in Ma.nagement of National Forests in the North Platte <br />Basin", Troendle and Tfankervis (20001) modified the operation of the Swanson and Bernier <br />(1986) program to refle;ct the changes in process interpretation that had occurred since the <br />WRENSS hydrologic niodel was initially developed (see Troendle and Nankervis 2000 for <br />operational details). <br />As noted above, in the original WRENSS Hydrologic model the precipitation input to the model <br />was adjusted to reflect differential accumulations in the forest and open using the "Rho" <br />redistribution function (see Figure II1.6, Troendle and Leaf 1980). The Rho function, as <br />originally defined, represented the integated influence of two separate wind driven actions on <br />snow pack accumulatioin in forest openings. First, small openings in the forest canopy were <br />believed to change the af;rodynamics in the canopy and result in greater deposition of snow in the <br />openings at the expense of the surrounding forest. As much as 35 percent more water equivalent <br />could be deposited in a 5 tree height (5-H) wide opening as the result of redistribution. As the <br />size of the opening inci•eased beyond 5-H, the efficiency of the opening to retain the trapped <br />snow decreased as a result of increase;d scour. As the opening size approached 14-H, scour <br />eliminated the increase in accumulation and the creation of openings larger than 14-H could <br />result in a net loss in snow pack accumulation. The RHO function integrated two processes: <br />differential accumulation and scour. Differential deposition, or redistribution, did not result in a <br />change in total precipitation entering the: system while scour represented a loss in precipitation to <br />the system. Snow scoure:d from the opeiungs is evaporated back to the atmosphere or transported <br />out of the watershed. Ci.inent thinking concludes that the increased deposition in the openings is <br />the result of a reduction in interception loss and not due to redistribution. However, in larger <br />openings, losses due to scour can and cio occur as defined in the original Rho function, though <br />roughness can be used in large openin€;s to reduce scour loss (Troendle and Meiman 1884). In <br />the hydrologic simulatic>ns performed ELs part of the initial North Platte analysis (Troendle and <br />Nankervis 2000) estimat:es of precipitati.on were mechanically increased to reflect the appropriate
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.