Laserfiche WebLink
Troendle/Nankervis/Porth Page24 5/22/2003 <br />Table 4: The nine stream gauges retaineci as Reference sites. <br />Site No Name of Stream a e <br />06710500 BEAR CREEK AIC MORRISON, CO. <br />06733000 BIG THOMPSON RI VER AT ESTES PARK, CO. <br />0675200(1 CACHE LA POUDRE R A MO OF CN, NR FT COLLINS, CO. <br />06620000 NORTH PLATTE RI VER NEAR NORTHGATE, CO <br />0672400G ST. VRAIN CREEiK AT LYONS, CO. <br />06623800 ENCAMPMENT RIV AB HOG PARK CR NR ENCAMPMENT WY <br />06625000 ENCAMPMENT RIVER AT MOUTH, NEAR ENCAMPMENT, WY <br />06659500 LARAMIE R AND PIONEER CANAL NR WOODS LANDING, WY <br />06622700 NORTH BRUSH CREEK NEAR SARATOGA, WY <br />SUmmary <br />This phase of the Plattt-I R.iver analysis had 3 outcomes. The first is the completion of the <br />revisions on the WRENS S hydrologic m.odel for Hydrologic Region 4, the cold snow zone of the <br />central and northern Rocky Mountains. :Previously, it had been anticipated that the model would <br />be incorporated into the current version of WRNSHED, the Canadian version of the WRENSS <br />hydrologic model supported by Robert Swanson. That is still an expectation, but in the interim, a <br />stand-alone SAS version has been developed. Although the simulation of water yield differs <br />from the WRENSS mode;l used in the earlier North Platte analysis Troendle and Nankervis 2000) <br />and the historical analysis reported o:n in this report, the predictions of change are quite <br />comparable. Secondary :>imulations of c;hange in flow following timber harvest at Fool Creek, <br />Deadhorse Creek, and Coon Creek were; more accurate and consistent using the cunent version <br />of the model. This was r.iot totally unexpected, however, since the current model was developed <br />using the data from all ithree watershed.s rather than only Fool Creek, as was the case for the <br />earlier WRENSS hydrolc?gic model. <br />Based on the projectiori of current stand conditions into the future, hydrologic simulations <br />indicate tha.t current streaun flow levels vn the North Platte River Basin will be further reduced by <br />20,000 acre-feet of annuLal water yield, or more, during the period from 1997 to 2017. Forest <br />removal, if continued at t:he rate at which it has occurred from 1997 to 2001, will recapture about <br />5000 acre-feet (0.05 area inches of watE;r yield) of tha.t reduction. Although not included in the <br />totals, it can be expected that tree mortallity, from both pest and fire, will increase stream flow to <br />some degree. <br />Seven to 9 stream gauges ha.ve been ide;ntified in both the North and South Platte River Basins <br />that may be useful in documenting future changes in water yield resulting from Forest Service <br />management activities. Comparative aria.lysis is achieved using long-term snow courses and <br />precipitation gauges. Troendle and Nank:ervis (2000) noted earlier that detection of flow changes <br />that result from vegetal;ion changes vvill be difficult using the USGS gauging stations as <br />reference sites. The longer the post-199'l record, the greater the probability of change detection, <br />should change occur. :[t is critical that monitoring at all reference sites (stream flow, <br />precipitation, and snow pack) be continued in the same manner as done presently. We found in <br />our analysis that proceduxal changes, such as moving gauge sites or conversion of manual snow