Laserfiche WebLink
Troendle/Nankervis/PortYi Page20 5/22/2003 <br />double mass plotted the snow course data from the 16 remaining stations over that for the Glade <br />Creek station. We kept 4 of the Coloradc? and 6 of the Wyoming snow courses. The compazison <br />of snow pack accumulation at Big South, in the Poudre River draina.ge did not compare well with <br />Glade Creek (Figure 18) while the Long:> Peak site was a good comparison (Figure 19). The 10 <br />snow courses selected foir further analysiis are listed in Table 2 of Appendix C along with their <br />location and length of record. <br />BIG THOMPSON RNER. AT ESTES PARK C0.:06733000 & <br />ENCPMPMENT RN AB HOG PA,RK CR NR ENCAtv1PMEN'I' WY0:06623800 <br />w <br />U <br />k. <br />? <br />0N <br />T <br />3 <br />? <br />> <br />.a <br />? <br />? <br />? <br />U <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />m <br />? <br />n <br />? <br />0 <br />06623800: Cumulative WYR DMF (cfs) <br />Figure 16. Example of a;stable double-mass comparison. The stream flow measured on the Big <br />Thompson River and at Hog Park aze strongly related indicating that the stream flow <br />measured at orie site is not changing relative to that measured at the other site. <br />In order to improve the analysis, we also assessed the availability of long-term precipitation data <br />to also compare with the stream flow data. Precipitation for Colorado and Wyoming can also be <br />obtained through the NRCS website " ://www.wcc.nres.usda.gov. We identified 10 sites, 8 in <br />Colorado and 2 in Wyoining that were currently in operation and had 50 or more years of <br />continuous record. We then compared those sites in a double-mass format with the snow course <br />data from Glade Creek in Wyoming. All compazisons appeared stable (see Appendix C) so a1110 <br />sites were retained for funther analysis. TYie precipitation sites, locations, and period of record are <br />presented in Table 3, Appendix C. <br />In Total, we retained 19 ;stream gauge locations, 10 snow courses, and 10 precipitation gauges <br />for further analysis. The rE:lative proximit:y of all the sites is shown in a Figure 19. <br />In the final selection process, all the historical stream flow record for the 19 stream gauges <br />selected were double-mass plotted against the over lapping record for the 3 nearest snow courses <br />and the 3 nearest precipiiation gauges. 'Ten of the 19 stream gauges were dropped from the <br />analysis and 9 sites were retained as refe;rence sites (Table 3). It should be noted that of the 9 <br />sites selected both the Bi€; Thompson River, at Estes Park, and St. Vrain Creek, at Lyon, do not <br />appear to have record ,3vailable since 1998. This may imply they have been closed or <br />0 200000 400000 600000 800000 ]000000 1200000 1400000