Laserfiche WebLink
Troendle/Nankervis/Porth Page 12 5/22/2003 <br />simulations presented in Figure 9 assume the stand cliaracteristics of spruce-fir are <br />constant for the period. <br />E:stimated V1later Yield from Forest Service Lands <br />in the Norl:h Platte Basin: 1700 -1997 <br />14 <br />13 - _ • . .. <br />c 12 <br />v • <br />? • <br />d <br />« <br />? 10 , . . <br />g -? Spruce-Fir BA ChangEs <br />pruce-Fir BA Constaiit . 8 . . <br />168 170 '172 174 176 178 180 182 184 186 188 190 192 194 196 198 200 <br />0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Figure 10: Simulated annual water yield from National Forest lands in the North Platte River <br />from 1700 to 1997 showing the cyclical pattern in yield that would exist if current <br />stand conditions were discourited back thru time in 20 year increments. <br />Simulation of activity in,lpacts was fairly straightforward. In Tables 1 and 2 above, it can be <br />noted that the simulated uvater yield frorri NFS land on the North Platte River was approximately <br />10.0 area inches in 1997 based on the S-AS simulations. In the projection of the adjusted stand <br />conditions to 2017, the s,imulated flow decreased to 9.7 area inches, indicating a 03 area inch <br />decline will occur as the iresult of additional re-growth for all species, including spruce-fir during <br />the period 1997 to 2017. Flow would be slightly greater (9.8 inches) if spruce-fir are not <br />adjusted. We simulated that water yield at the time existing stands all reach maximum <br />hydrologic utilization will be 9.1 areat inches of water yield indicating a nearly 0.6 inch <br />additiona.l decrease in flow could occtu• in the future. The simulated decrease in flow, as the <br />result of increased stand density from 1997 to 2017, is approximately 27,000 acre-feet of water. <br />Again, because of the dominant influenc;e of increased density in the spruce-fir forest type, this <br />estimate may be high as discussed earlier. <br />There are two significant points that can be made from the results of the historical flow analysis. <br />First, average water yieldl is declining as vegetation density increases over time. Water that may <br />have been available for appropriation wh.en agreements and compacts were made in the past may <br />not be available to meet those commitnnents today, making water short falls and the need for <br />long term planning more critical than ever. Also, current levels of stream flow may not be stable <br />into the future and subject to further decllines, at least for the next 30 to 50 yeazs. A second point