Laserfiche WebLink
Troendle/Nankervis/Porth Page 10 5/22/2003 <br />types seem consistent atid reasonable wlhen compared to other accounts of stand development for <br />those individual specie:>. The simulated pattern in stream flow decline for all species, except <br />spruce-fir is consistent with the decline simulated using the DOS version of the WRENSS <br />hydrologic model. Only the spruce-fir simulations differ significantly and that is largely because <br />current stands are predc>minantly saw timber and the process of taking them back in time and <br />then allowing them to "regrow" causes a uniform increase in density, and decrease in stream <br />flow, over time. <br />In contrast to the way we initially treated the spruce-fir type, it is equally, or perhaps more likely, <br />that the spruce-fir standls that are now considered mature forest may have been mature forest <br />stands for the entire periiod from 1860 to present and therefore contributed little to the simulated <br />historical decline in stream flow as pi•esented above (Figure 2, Table 1) or in Troendle and <br />Nankervis (2000). In order to assess the impact, a second set of hydrologic simulations were <br />made, holding the spruae-fir constant duiring the 1860 to 1997 period, and the impact on the total <br />flow was quite dramatic; (Table 2 and :Figure 9). The decline in stream low simulated to have <br />occurred from 1860 to 1997, when the density of the spruce-fir component was adjusted, was <br />about 3.4 area inches ('table 1 and 2). When the density of the spruce-fir component is held <br />constant, the stream floix decline from 1860 to 1997 is 1.8 azea inches (Table 2). In addition, <br />stream flow from the enl:ire basin during; the 1960 to 1997 is virtually constant when spruce-fir is <br />held constant and only a moderate declxne occurs from 1997 to 2017. Based on a conservative <br />interpretation of earlier simulations, Tmendle and Nankervis (2000) concluded that by the year <br />2000, the decline in flomr from Forest Service land in the North Platte River Basin resulting from <br />increased vegetation density during the 11860 to 2000 period was approxirnately 190,000 acre feet <br />of water per year by the yeaz 2000. The analysis using the SAS version of the model, used in this <br />analysis, supports that c;onclusion. The estimate of decline in stream flow, holding spruce-fir <br />constant, is reduced to approximately 166,000 acre-feet of water per year by the year 1997. T'he <br />additional decline in stream flow simulated to occur from 1997 too 2017 is still 0.3 area inches or <br />neazly 27,000 acre feet of water per year by 2017. <br />In the earlier report (Troendle and Nankervis 2000), the time period used for the historical stream <br />flow simulations was s;elected independent of the stand data. It was a coincidence in the <br />subsequent analysis that the average age of the saw timber stands (about 180 yeazs) was such that <br />they "originated" about -the same time as the historical simulations began (1860). This gives the <br />impression that flows were very high at the beginning of the time period of interest and low <br />today. The conclusion triat stream flowsi in the North Platte have declined since 1860 is correct, <br />however, that does not imply that streatn flow had been consistently high prior to 1860. Using <br />the same logic of moving the stands back in time, in 20-year increments, we moved them back <br />further to the year 1700. The assumption was made that 20-years prior to any stand being <br />"discounted' to zero age„ that stand was a mature saw timber stand completely occupying the site <br />hydrologically. The hydrologic simulatlions were run for stand conditions for 1700 to 2017 <br />(Figure 10). One can note that stream flow did peak in the 1860 to 1900 period and that it has <br />declined since (Figure 10). One can alsco note that flows were equally low in the early 1800's as <br />they are today and equally high in the 1700's as they were in the 1800's. Stream flow estimates, <br />holding spruce-fir constant are generallw lower than the simulations that allowed the density of <br />spruce-fir to be adjusted.