My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Opstudy Comparison Model Runs
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Opstudy Comparison Model Runs
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:40:09 PM
Creation date
7/9/2009 11:00:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.750
Description
Governance Committee Meeting
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/25/2003
Author
Unknown
Title
Opstudy Comparison Model Runs
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Modeling of Nebraska's Depletions <br />Nebraska's first increment depletions were modeled by reducing gains in five reaches of <br />the Platte River. The North Platte-Brady, the Brady-Cozad, the Cozad-Overton, the <br />Overton-Odessa, and the Odessa-Grand Island gains were each reduced by 4.2 kaf per <br />year (4.2/12 = 0.35 kaf per month) for a total reduction of 21 kaf (5*4.2) per year. The <br />reduced gains were used in the Program Alternative Scenario 2(PA2) run. This reduced <br />the score from 144.0 to 132.5 kaf or a difference of 11.5 kaf, which is close to Nebraska's <br />estimated first increment depletions of 12 kaf. <br />The projects identified in the WAP to meet Nebraska's future depletions are ground <br />water management, power interference, a central Platte reregulatory reservoir, and the <br />Gothenburg/Dawson recharge project. The Gothenburg/Dawson recharge project is not <br />modeled in the Opstudy model so it is excluded from this analysis. Nebraska's future <br />depletion plan was implemented by setting the three projects that are in the Opstudy <br />model at their future depletions levels (removing limits on power interference, setting the <br />size of the reregulatory reservoir to match the WAP, and increasing the amount of water <br />regulated by ground water recharge). <br />In addition, the inlet and outlet capacity of the central Platte reregulatory reservoir were <br />increased from 100 cfs and 50 cfs respectively to 200 cfs. <br />These changes result in a score of 144.3 kaf or a difference of 11.8 kaf, which meets <br />Nebraska's first increment depletions of 12 kaf when 800 af of additional benefit from <br />the GothenburglDawson recharge project is added to the score. <br />In addition to Nebraska's future depletions, 150 af was added for first increment federal <br />depletions. 50 af per year were removed from the flows above McConaughy, flows at <br />Julesburg, and the Cozad-Overton gain. <br />Julesburg flows that represent Colorado's future depletions (described previously) were <br />used to represent flows from the South Platte River. <br />The attached Excel spreadsheet summarizes changes to key model outputs on an average <br />basis, and on an irrigation season and non-irrigation season basis.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.