My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Governance Committee Minutes
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Governance Committee Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:39:15 PM
Creation date
6/22/2009 1:47:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.750
Description
Governance Committee
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
PRRIP
Title
Governance Committee Minutes
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
process can proceed. In addition, it was interpreted that a water user must sign a recovery <br />agreement with both the State of Wyoming and the FWS. This was never the case. Attachment <br />III has been revised to clarify that when a water user must provide mitigation for coverage under <br />the plan and program, the water user and the State of Wyoming will negotiate a Wyoming <br />Recovery Agreement, which will be submitted to the federal action agency and FWS for review <br />prior to execution. This eliminates the need for a recovery agreement between the water user <br />and the FWS. Mark Butler agreed with the proposed changes. Mike Purcell will send a revised <br />Depletions Plan including redline and clean versions for review. If parties have comments they <br />should be sent to Mike Purcell. Concern was raised that this topic was not brought forward as a <br />full action item with documentation before the meeting. <br />Program responsibilities regarding Cottonwood Ranch <br />Brian Barels provided an overview of the Cottonwood Ranch development and enhancement <br />efforts. There is a 6-phased plan that was approved by FERC after review and approval by the <br />Cottonwood Ranch Management Oversight Committee. The FERC license agreement provides <br />that once the Program begins, the Program becomes responsible for costs of previous <br />development and management as well as future efforts. It is understood that the Program does <br />not have federal authorization, and therefore cannot fund management/maintenance actions at <br />this time. Brian explained that NPPD is willing to move forward with the 2007 portion of the <br />development plan and conduct the maintenance activities with the understanding that NPPD will <br />be reimbursed. The existing agreement also provides for reimbursement for the work through <br />2006. At the time reimbursement is requested, NPPD will provide a detailed accounting for all <br />work done on Cottonwood Ranch as provided for by the FERC License Agreement. Brian noted <br />that NPPD is still operating within the original cap of $1.3 M in 1997 dollars. <br />The action items approved by the GC were: 1) reimburse NPPD for wark through 2006, <br />approximately $800K, and 2) reimburse costs for 2007 maintenance activities ($75K) and <br />improvements (budget to be provided). The expectation is that NPPD will provide invoices with <br />supporting materials and will be reimbursed within 1 year of federal authorization. It was noted <br />that there may be a need for a more formal agreement with NPPD at some point on exactly what <br />the Program's rights are in regards to Cottonwood Ranch, as identified in the Land Plan. NPPD <br />will draft this agreement for the GC to consider when appropriate. In addition, the GC appointed <br />the Executive Director to sit on the Oversight Committee. <br />Districts Monitoring <br />Brian Barels reviewed the Districts monitoring efforts that they have been conducting since the <br />licenses were provided. According to the licenses, the biological monitoring plan needs to be <br />coordinated with the Program through consultation with GC within 6-months of Program <br />initiation. Brian recommended that the Executive Director be appointed to the Monitoring <br />Oversight Committee (different than the oversight committee identified above), to provide <br />necessary coordination with the monitaring plan. GC appointed the Executive Director to the <br />Monitoring Oversight Committee. Brian noted that if inembers of the GC have comments on the <br />current monitoring plan that they can be sent directly to him, but in the future the coordination <br />will be with the Executive Director. <br />Page 2 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.