My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRRIP Governance Committee Meeting and Materials
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
PRRIP Governance Committee Meeting and Materials
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:39:13 PM
Creation date
6/22/2009 12:27:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.750
Description
Governance Committee
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
PRRIP
Title
PRRIP Governance Committee Meeting and Materials
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
dependant worksheet cells (unless you wish to substantially alter this example). <br />• Column 3: EA diversion at Keystone by NPPD into Sutherland Canal system. No EA diversions are <br />anticipated due to "conservation mode" operation by NPPD in 2008. (Currently, there are no diversions in <br />these cells, only zeros). <br />Column 4: The EA water passing the Keystone diversion is equal to the Mac EA release (co12) minus <br />NPPD's EA diversion at Keystone (co13). <br />Column 5: NPPD's estimated return of EA water via the North Platte Hydro. The NPPD EA return equals <br />the NPPD keystone diversion (co13), with a 2-day lag, multiplied by a factor to represent higher initial <br />losses which diminish over time as EA diversions continue. If NPPD diversions of EA at Keystone are <br />anticipated, then these cells/loss, factors should be adjusted as needed, based on experience. Currently, <br />the first four factors are 0.75 (days 5-8), and subsequent days are 0.8. <br />Column 6: The estimated EA flow at the North Platte River at North Platte gage is equal to the EA <br />passing the Keystone Diversion (co14), with a 2-day lag, multiplied by a factor to represent higher initial <br />losses which diminish over time as EA releases down the North Platte River continue. The first factor <br />(day 5) is 0.5, and subsequent days are: 0.6 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95, and then remain at 0.95. <br />These factors should be adjusted as necessary, based on experience. <br />Column 7: Estimated North Platte River gains between the Keystone Diversion and the North Platte River <br />at North Platte gage. For reference, the 1995-2004 median March flow was 342 cfs. These cells should be <br />adjusted using the anticipated gains prior to and during the EA pulse. The values shown in the example <br />• illustrate that gains are anticipated to decrease while EA flows rise and crest. <br />Column 8: The total flow at the North Platte River at North Platte gage is equal to the EA water at the <br />North Platte River gage plus the Keystone to North Platte river gains (cols 6+ 7). The NWS flood-limit is <br />currently set at 1,980 cfs. Although the worksheet does not enforce this limit, the maximum daily flow is <br />shown at the column bottom and should be checked. <br />NORTH PLATTE RIVER & SOUTH PLATTE RIVER CONFLUENCE <br />Column 9: The total flow at the North Platte River and South Platte River confluence is equal to the South <br />Platte River inflow (col 1), plus the NPPD EA returns at the North Platte Hydro (co15), plus the total flow <br />at the North Platte River gage (co18). <br />Column 10: The EA flow at the confluence is equal to the NPPD EA return (co15) plus the EA flow at the <br />North Platte River gage (co16). <br />Column 11: The non-EA flow at the confluence is equal to the South Platte River inflow (col 1) plus the <br />North Platte River gains (co17). If non-EA water is being moved through NPPD's system, then the <br />worksheet must be expanded accordingly to account for that water in NPPD's system and in the North <br />Platte River. Again, no non-EA water is anticipated to be released in this example scenario. <br />CNPPID DIVERSION <br />Column 12: The total diversion at the CNPPID diversion is equal to the minimum of the total flow at the <br />? confluence (co19) and the CNPPID canal capacity of 2,250 cfs. For days of intentional EA bypass (shown <br />Water Year 2008 EA AOP 38 October 15, 2007
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.