My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRRIP Governance Committee Meeting and Materials
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
PRRIP Governance Committee Meeting and Materials
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:39:13 PM
Creation date
6/22/2009 12:27:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.750
Description
Governance Committee
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
PRRIP
Title
PRRIP Governance Committee Meeting and Materials
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bleed said she is not sure where this is headed and that the GC needs to know what they will do <br />• in order to decide who to seat on the ISAC. Strickland said the way ISAC was conceived was a <br />2-part review process: 1) specific peer review on protocols, and 2) an overall review of the way <br />the Program is operating from a scientific perspective. The GC may have a question about the <br />overall process that ISAC needs to address and that the ISAC will meet at the pleasure of the <br />GC. Strickland said it is a good idea to have the ISAC review the Integrated Monitoring and <br />Research Plan (IMRP). The AMP has been peer reviewed, but the IMRP has not been peer <br />reviewed. Bleed asked if Strickland sees the ISAC as having a broad base and then having other <br />experts pulled in to answer specific questions. Strickland said we won't be able to seat an ISAC <br />with all areas of expertise that you will ever need, so the ISAC can do more general peer review. <br />Kowalski said he recommends seating the Selection Panel, having the ED's Office develop the <br />scope of work, and then distribute that draft to the Selection Panel and possibly more widely for <br />comment. Strickland said you have 13 years to do work, and only 12 years are left. He said it is <br />a good idea to get the ISAC up and running early to not end up having too much information <br />collected before all appropriate peer review is completed. Purcell said the GC should agree to <br />the proposed schedule so that the GC can approve the scope of work at the December GC <br />meeting. Ryan suggested that the Selection Panel look at other efforts like this around the <br />country to help us go down the right road and have good technical support. <br />Luecke said the Selection Panel needs somebody outside process and that the International Crane <br />Foundation (ICF) might have some good suggestions. Ryan said it seems we are looking for <br />someone on the Selection Panel that has some technical background in the issues. Mike Drain <br />said we are just setting up a panel to speed up the process. The GC will eventually approve the <br />• ISAC members and we can still get outside input without having an official seat on the selection <br />panel. Purcell said to let process proceed and that the Selection Panel can help get senior <br />scientist input on their own. <br />DBMS <br />Kenny walked through the justification he developed in support of selecting the FWS team to <br />manage the Database Management System (DBMS). Purcell said the justification document <br />looks like it adequately addresses the issue. Ryan said it looks like the document does a good <br />job of addressing concerns and that it looks like the decision to go with the FWS team is <br />appropriate. <br />. <br />Don Hunter from the FWS team gave a presentation about their approach to the database work. <br />The team is thinking about how to get their arms around data which is a big project in terms of <br />scale. We feel it is our job to work with you to make this work since the database and the Web <br />site will be your portal to the world and also your data input and management system. We can't <br />think of this as a static program because you are just in year 1 of 13. Our job has been to stay on <br />top of our game and integrate the best things available for every project. The FWS team has <br />evolved as a product and a service shop. For the service part, we do what we can to help instead <br />of just taking information and going away. We try to help develop prototypes and straw man <br />systems that help things get discussed. We are always staffed with professionals (GS-12, 13, <br />14). One of our successes is that if we see IT innovations, we go out and look at it to see if it <br />works for a particular project (R&D). Once we set up a project, we work to set up tasks and <br />This document is a draft based on one person's notes of the meeting. The official meeting minutes may be different <br />if conections are made by the Governance Committee before approval. Page 8 of 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.