Laserfiche WebLink
NoRh Sterling Irrigation District <br />May 12, 2009 (UPDATED May 22, 2009) <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Agenda Item 17d <br />1. The no-action alternative; <br />2. Enlarge .the current spillway only; <br />3. Enlarge the current spillway and increase the dam freeboard with a parapet wall; <br />4. Enlarge the current spillway and increase the dam freeboard with soil; <br />5. Enlarge the current spillway, increase the dam height to increase freeboard and create <br />additional storage. <br />Alternative No. 1 was considered unacceptable since it means the Reservoir storage would be <br />restricted by the SEO. <br />Alternative No. 2 was ruled out because enlarging the spillway alone would require a substantial <br />amount of earthmoving without addressing the dam crest. <br />Alternative No. 3 was ruled out due to the cost of construction of the parapet wall. <br />Selected Alternative No. 4 was selected because with additional freeboard, the width of the <br />spillway is significantly less, therefore requiring less ea.rth work and at the same time addresses <br />the dam crest issue and spillway issue. <br />Alternative No. S was ruled out predominately due to cost but also due to the inability to attract <br />partners in the increased storage. <br />The selected alternative, Alternative No. 4, consists of widening the current auxiliary spillway <br />from 530 feet to 915 feet, lowering the crest of the auxiliary spillway by 0.5 feet (to match the <br />primary spillway), and raising the dam crest approximately 2.5 feet. Also included in the Project <br />is the construction of a seepage collection system on the downstream slope of the dam. <br />W.W. Wheeler and Associates, Inc. performed the design of the spillway. The design is <br />currently being reviewed by the SEO. Construction is expected to begin in the summer/fall of <br />2009 with a 90 day construction window. <br />The District obtained a cost estimate from Cornerstone Construction of Sterling, Colorado, <br />which is presented in Table 2. <br />TABLE 2 <br />PROJECT COST <br />Construction $ 999,350 <br />Engineerin $ 48,000 <br />Contin enc $ 157,100 <br />TOTAL $ 1,204,450 <br />