Laserfiche WebLink
and Regulations for Dam Safety and Dam Construction, the spillway was required to safely <br />route the runoff generated by 75% of the probable maximum storm as defined by the <br />National Weather Service. URS in their 2006 feasibility report estimated that the current <br />spillway has a capacity of 42,000 cfs, but the routed reservoir outflow from the 75% PMP <br />event was over 100,000 cfs and would overtop the dam by approximately 8 feet. Since that <br />report, the SEO has promulgated new Rules and Regulations for Dam Safety and Dam <br />Construction that allow reductions in the NWS PMP values for altitude and the use of a site <br />specific weather model developed by the SEO for high altitude precipitation referred to as <br />the Extreme Precipitation Analysis Tool (EPAT). Reductions of 40% of the Probable <br />Maximum Precipitation (PMP) values have been observed in some basins with the use of <br />this tool. Over 90% of the 640 square mile drainage basin flowing into the reservoir is <br />above 6,000 ft. MSL, the lower limit for use of the EPAT process. <br />Based on the new permitted reductions in PMP values, it is feasible to permanently ]ower <br />the existing spillway to an elevation that could safely route the required inflow design flood. <br />There is sufficient elevation difference between the existing concrete ogee crest spillway, <br />the reservoir basin and the rock cut spillway discharge channel to lower the emergency <br />spillway 25 vertical feet. This elevation roughly corresponds to the current restricted <br />storage level of gauge height 100 feet. Lowering the spi]]way to this level would produce <br />57,000 acre-feet of flood routing storage and significantly increase the spillway capacity. <br />The goal would be to only lower the spillway to an elevation that could safely pass the <br />required inflow design flood and maintain as much reservoir storage as possible. A detailed <br />basin and reservoir hydrologic model would be developed in conjunction with the EPAT <br />tool to determine the required spillway control elevation. <br />While there are significant structural issues with the present dam embankment that make <br />permanent reservoir storage at higher elevations not feasible, the dam has performed <br />adequately for the past twenty years at the current restricted level of gauge height 100 feet. <br />No additional embankment consolidation or displacement has been measured and only <br />minor increases in seepage have been noted at the maximum restricted storage level. <br />Permanently lowering the spillway and restricting the maximum storage level could have <br />an additional benefit by reducing the hazard classification from high to significant hazard. A <br />Failure Modes and Consequences Analysis study is planned to evaluate the structural issues <br />and the need for a stability / seepage control berm along the downstream toe of the dam <br />will be considered, particularly if storage levels are increased above the current restricted <br />level. <br />A key component toward rehabilitating the existing dam at a permanently reduced storage <br />level would be to improve outlet operation reliability and a significantly improved <br />instrumentation and monitoring program. <br />Cucharas Feasibility Study ~ Project Alternatives <br />