Laserfiche WebLink
F) COMPARISON OF WATER DEMAND AND AVAILABILITY <br />Based on the Lytle Water Solutions report, the Company irrigation demands are regularly <br />greater than the availability but with a supplemental supply from Cucharas Reservoir, the <br />target demand was met in 11 of 24 years. <br />G) WATER QUALITY ISSUES <br />Storage and periodic releases from Cucharas Reservoir improves the water and stream qualiry <br />in the Cucharas River Canyon below the dam. If a zero storage restriction were imposed by the <br />SEO and the two operational 30-inch diameter gates were left fully open, allowing all tributary <br />inflow to pass through them, Iarge quantities of silt would be eroded by stream flow through <br />the reservoir basin and be deposited in the pristine river canyon below. The qualiry of Aquatic <br />habitat, wildlife and esthetic values would be significantly impacted. <br />H) FIELD INVESTIGATIONS <br />Existing data from previous field investigations was reviewed and determined suitable for <br />this level of study. Further field investigations may be required based upon more detailed <br />engineering analyses. Previous geotechnical investigations include those performed for the <br />original construction of the dam and those completed in 1986 by GEI Consultants. Following is a <br />summary of the findings contained in those reports. <br />Prior to construction of the dam in 1909, five test holes were drilled in the canyon floor. Four <br />holes in the 200-foot wide river channel section and one hole 35 feet above the river channel on <br />the right abutment. These borings indicated that the foundation consists of 20 to 40 feet of <br />sandy soils and boulders over shale bedrock in the channel section and approximately 30 feet of <br />clayey soils and boulders over bedrock on the right abutment. <br />A geotechnical field exploration was also performed in 1986 by GEI during a safety evaluation <br />of Cucharas Dam. The investigation consisted of drilling five test borings into the dam and at the <br />downstream toe of the dam, including five observation wells. Three bore holes located along the <br />downstream toe were advanced to an approximate depth of 25 feet and two bore holes located <br />on the crest of the dam were advanced to an approximated depth of 140 feet. <br />The foundation soils at the toe of the dam and under the dam consisted of 10 - 17 feet of silty <br />sand, silty gravelly sand and silty sand and gravel overlaying 0- 4 feet of clayey gravels. The <br />silty sand layer was composed of mostly fine to medium sand, with approximately 10 to 501ow <br />plasticity fines and 0 to 20 percent gravels up to 1-inch maximum size. The clay gravel was <br />composed of 1/z - 1-inch gravels with a 30 percent widely graded sand with about 30% medium <br />plasticity fines. Standard penetration tests (SPT) ranged from 7 blows/ft to 50 blows/3 inches <br />and averaged 23 blows/ft. <br />Bedrock was encountered at depths of 17 to ZO feet along the toe of the dam and consisted <br />of hard to very hard claystone and shale with interbedded sandstone layers. Borings were <br />advanced approximately 5 feet into bedrock. <br />The materials in the embankment can be divided into two types: 1) Mixed earth fill/rock fill in <br />the upper section of the dam and 2) Sound rock fill in the lower section of the dam. The mixed <br />Cucharas Feasibility Study ~ Project Background and 1Veed <br />