My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150290 Approval letter
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
C150290 Approval letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2015 2:19:09 PM
Creation date
6/18/2009 8:43:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
CT2015-030
C150290
Contractor Name
Joseph W. Bowles Reservoir Company
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Jefferson
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Joseph W. Bowles Reservoir Company <br />May 12, 2009 (UPDATED May 22, 2009) <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Table 1. Water Rights <br />Agenda Item 17c <br /> Appropriation Adjudication Amount Bowles No. 1 Decreed <br />Water Right Use Date Date Ca aci Use <br />All Bowles ~ <br />Systems 5/10/1876 2/4/1884 11.06 cfs 2,110.5 AF Irrigation <br />Reservoirs <br />All Bowles <br />Systems 5/15/1880 2/4/1884 15.75 cfs 2,110.5 AF Irrigation <br />Reservoirs <br />Joseph W. Bowles <br />No. 1 Reservoir 3/9/1883 9/24/1935 33.19 cfs 362.56 AF Irrigation <br />Enlar ement <br />The Reservoir has the second-most senior reservoir storage decree on the main stem of Bear <br />Creek and down the South Platte River to the state line. As such, it is generally expected to fill <br />each year. Records show that the Reservoir is filled to or near maximum capacity during most <br />years and undergoes moderate drawdown each year. The net yield released from the Reservoir <br />to shareholders has historically averaged about 2.2 acre-feet per share (or roughly 900 AF). <br />Project Description <br />While the Reservoir is not currently operating under a fill restriction, the Company wants to <br />complete this Project to correct dam-safety deficiencies and to rehabilitate the deteriorating inlet <br />ditch to the Reservoir. Three alternatives were considered for this Project: <br />1. The no-action alternative; <br />2. Dam rehabilitation and ditch rehabilitation; <br />3. Dam reconstruction and ditch rehabilitation. <br />Alternative No. 1- This alternative was considered unacceptable because it is expected that the <br />SEO would eventually impose a storage restriction on the dam, thereby affecting future water <br />use and storage. <br />Selected Alternative No. 2-This alternative would include widening the crest, reconstructing the <br />upstream slope, and installing a seepage collection and toe drain system on the downstream slope. <br />Work on the inlet ditch includes removing trees, reconstructing the ditch cross section and <br />alignment, placing slope protection in high erosion areas, and installing a flow control pipe that <br />will provide for discharge of excessive ditch flows into an existing spillway and drainage <br />structure. The cost for this alternative is estimated to be $1,874,000. <br />Alternative No. 3- This alternative would require full removal and complete rebuilding of the <br />dam. The new dam would be similar in cross section to Alternative No. 2. The inlet work would <br />also be the same as listed in Alternative No. 2. The cost for this alternative is estimated to be <br />$3,020,000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.