Laserfiche WebLink
area, sometimes called the ABig Bend@ area <br />which the whooping cranes passed before sp <br />south and their breeding grounds to the north <br />of the species here than in any other part c <br />records indicate continued heavy use withir <br />indicates that the combination of the Platte <br />rainwater basins, and farmlands form a uni <br />valuable part of the entire migration route of t: <br />this habitat association, especially in the wate <br />an adverse effect on the surviving population i <br />)f the Platte River, was a focal point through <br />reading out to their wintering grounds to the <br />There are more old records of the presence <br />f the migration route, and recent confirmed <br />the last few years. Available information <br />River channel, and adjacent wet meadows, <br />lue association of habitats that is the most <br />ie species. Reduction in the quality or size of <br />r level of the area, could be expected to have <br />of the species." <br />In the final rule published may 15, 1978, USFW <br />i.e., the Rainwater Basins. However, it left intact <br />to Denham, Nebraska. <br />deleted the area to the south of the Platte River, <br />e designation of the Platte River from Lexington <br />In the final ruling, the Service failed to disting ish between nesting habitat at Aransas, roosting <br />habitat in Canada, and migration habitat used n the migration corridor. USFWS ignored the <br />confirmed sighting data on the Platte River and the results of the radio-tracking survey that was <br />conducted in early 1980s by USFWS. The con irmed sighting data available from 1942 through <br />1977 showed that observations of whooping crane use on the Platte River were scant and rare. Only <br />1.0 percent of the whooping crane population cros ing the Platte was observed using the Platte River <br />from 1942 to 1977. <br />The confirmed sighting data for 1942 to 1977 <br />central Nebraska as critical habitat. <br />not support designation of the Platte River in <br />Data since 1978 also does not support designati <br />percent of the whooping crane population crossin <br />Platte River between 1978 and 2002. This low <br />efforts along the Platte since 1978, and a populati( <br />The proposed rule rationalized designation of criti <br />the south" in part based on "Historical data show <br />of the Platte River was the focal point through w <br />out to the south to their wintering grounds and th <br />old records of the presence of species here than i <br />confirmed si htin s indicate heav use within the <br />is, at best, grossly inaccurate, as indicated by <br />demonstrates that the Service ignored the confi <br />critical habitat. <br />The statement "There are more old records of the <br />migration route ..." reflects the failure to unde <br />records" are addressed extensively in the EA repor <br />1 of the Platte River critical habitat. Only 2.4 <br />the Platte was actually being observed using the <br />ercentage persists despite intensive observation <br />increase from 75 to 185. <br />al habitat for the "Platte River and wet prairie to <br />hat this area, sometimes called the Big Bend area <br />ich the whooping crane passed before spreading <br />ir breeding grounds to the north. There are more <br />any other part of the migration route, and recent <br />last few ears." The latter part of this statement <br />the confirmed sighting record. The statement <br />ed sighting data on the Platte in designating the <br />)resence of species here than any other part of the <br />stand or analyze those "old records." The "old <br />(1985) on whooping crane migration dynamics. <br />A-15