Laserfiche WebLink
In his classic monograph on the species ("T] <br />eliminated records involving at least 77 percent <br />1912-1944, including approximately 68 percent <br />approximately 92 percent of the birds reported t <br />records, Allen made his decisions primarily on tl <br />were numerically within reason and rejected sig: <br />the years in question. However, in doing so, A <br />sightings by the same individuals - in effect, al <br />identifiers. Consequently, the integrity of the pr <br />impaired with remaining uncertainty. <br />Whooping Crane", published in 1952), Allen <br />f the whooping cranes sighted in Nebraska from <br />F the birds reported by Swenk (1912-1933) , and <br />Brooking (1934-1944). In revising the Nebraska <br />basis of numbers: i.e., he accepted sightings that <br />ngs that involved too many whooping cranes for <br />?n at times accepted and at other times rejected <br />-nately endorsing and refuting their reliability as <br />1950's Nebraska records, as revised by Allen, is <br />Confirmed Si2htings (Section 3.2): Because of identification problems associated with the early <br />sightings data, more stringent criteria for confinin whooping crane sightings along the flyway were <br />developed by the Whooping Crane Recovery Tea in 1978. <br />The current version of the Confirmed Sightings <br />cranes recorded on or near (within 1 mile o fl the <br />number of birds was not specified for one sighti: <br />over the river. In this regard, 8 confirmed sigh <br />observed on the Platte River from 1940-1984, w <br />percent of the total whooping cranes reported in <br />observed on the river over this 45-year period cc <br />1 bird every 2 years. Given that the flock size di <br />sighting frequency is perhaps better expressed as <br />ist includes 14 sightings of at least 39 whooping <br />latte River over the 45-year period 1940-1984; the <br />. Some of these sightings were of migrants flying <br />igs involving 24 whooping cranes were actually <br />ch represent 9 percent of the total sightings and 9 <br />ebraska during this time. The 24 whooping cranes <br />espond to an average sighting frequency of about <br />ng migration averages approximately 3 birds, this <br />ne sighting of 3 birds every 5 to 6 years. <br />Sighting Trends (Section 3.3): Disregarding the <br />full tally of past to present whooping crane sight <br />adding appropriate 1940-1984 records from the C <br />accepted by Allen. This compiled list includes <br />whooping cranes observed on or near the Platte : <br />number of birds was not specified for two sightir <br />no fewer than 127 whooping cranes (80 percent <br />Platte River from Lexington Nebraska to about 21 <br />as critical habitat on May 15, 1978. <br />roblematic nature of the pre-1950 `s data base, a <br />igs on or near the Platte River was compiled by <br />?nfirmed Sightings List to the 1912-1948 records <br />a total of 43 sightings involving at least 158 <br />iver over the entire period from 1912-1984 (the <br />;s). Of these, 34 sightings (79 percent) involving <br />were observed within the 54-mile reach of the <br />miles east of Kearney designated by the Service <br />The compiled list of records for the 73-year perio 1912-1984 includes 31 sightings totaling at least <br />120 whooping cranes that were actually observe on the Platte River. Of these, 26 sightings (84 <br />percent) involving no less than 101 birds (84 perce t) were observed within the critical habitat zone. <br />It is noteworthy that among the records of whoo ing cranes sighted on the Platte River, markedly <br />higher percentages of birds were observed withi the critical habitat zone in the 36-year period <br />1912-1949 (91 of 100 birds, or 91 percent) than i the subsequent 35-year period 1950-1984 (10 of <br />20 birds, or 50 percent). This is likely influencedI to some extent, by locational bias in the pre-1950 <br />records stemming from the fact that most of these arlier sightings were compiled by Swenk and