Laserfiche WebLink
(2) <br />(3) <br />inflows at the upstream end of the reac <br />assigned to positive reach gains. Disc <br />how the Nebraska DWR Platte River i <br />The tracking spreadsheet projects Gra: <br />determine if Tamarack can divert toda <br />not correct and Tamarack subsequentl <br />involved how that would be made up. <br />made when flows drop to within a thr( <br />that Colorado's commitment of 27,00i <br />is a net amount such that inadvertent c <br />requested by EA Manager) would be c <br />•A future issue for review and discussi <br />quantifies the accretions from the groi <br />accretions are an input to the tracking <br />(4) Changes in spreadsheet displays and n <br />graphs were suggested at the 12/03/01 <br />be incorporated in future versions. Th <br />projection methodologies. Cunently t <br />days to project Grand Island gage and <br />projecting a downstream gage based o <br />based on storm events at rain gages. <br />h and this option allows them to also be <br />issions will continue on methodologies and <br />;ach accounting program handles this issue, <br />d Island flow 8 days in advance to <br />? because of excesses. If the projection is <br />i diverts during shortages, discussions <br />One option is a buffer so diversions are not <br />shold amount of targets. It was discussed <br />acre-feet average annual during shortages <br />iversions during shortages (unless <br />ompensated on an average annual basis. <br />?n is Colorado's groundwater modeling that <br />water recharge activities. These <br />)menclature including the addition of <br />Tamarack subcommittee meeting and will <br />-re were considerable discussions on <br />ie spreadsheet uses the trend of the last 4 <br />xher flows. Other ideas were (a) <br />i an upstream gage and (b) projections <br />E. Nebraska Requirements <br />(1) NPPD, CNPPID, and NEDWR issues and requirements for exchanging Tamarack <br />Water into the Environmental Accoun in Lake McConaughy. Options and <br />operating rules for an exchange agree ent using the Korty Canal need further <br />discussion. Initial discussions noted t at such exchange operations would need to <br />be tested and reev.aluated over time as experience and knowledge with Tamarack <br />increases. <br />(2) NPPD, CNPPID, and NEDWR issues on the necessity of an appropriation under <br />Nebraska water law for the recognitio of Tamarack Water. <br />Other Issues for Overall WMC Discuss <br />(1) Coordinating and scheduling diversio: <br />projects. Some options for discussion <br />based on water source inflows, others <br />(2) Criteria for determining type of Watei <br />target flows. Year type and targets to <br />October of each year. <br />(3) Differences in measured daily flows t <br />gage and the USGS Grand Island gagi <br />(4) River icing conditions and resulting ii <br />determination of excesses and shortaE <br />s of excesses among Water Action Plan <br />are: "first come, first serve", proportioning. <br />Year (wet, average, dry) and corresponding <br />)e established by the EA Manager in <br />the Nebraska DWR Grand Island <br />accuracies of ineasured gage flows and the