Laserfiche WebLink
80 )ournal of Weather Modification Volume 41 <br />tained by multiplying the acute value by 0.5. <br />Chronic tests are significantly influenced by the <br />binding of siNer ion to the food used during the <br />test period. <br />Guadagnolo et al. (2001) showed that silver con- <br />centratlons in different compartments of rainbow <br />trout eggs were greatest just before hatch. How- <br />ever, they noted that the silver burden was not <br />correlated with mortality. <br />5. FACTORS AFFECTING THE BIOAVAIL- <br />ABILITY AND TOXICITY OF SIWER <br />5.1 General Discussion <br />lt is now dear from a large number of studies, <br />that the toxicity of silver ion in water is signifi- <br />cantly ameliorated by the presence in water of <br />species such as chloride ion, sulfide ion, carbon- <br />ate and dissolved organic carbon. In addition, <br />silver is strongiy adsorbed onto particulate mat- <br />ter. Where the number of moles of each of these <br />ameliorating fadors in total, is greater than the <br />number of moles of silver added there is a negli- <br />gibie risk of boxicity due to silver occumng. The <br />explanation for this is discussed below. <br />Bell and Kramer (1999) found that in the aqueous <br />phase, silver at the lowest concenVations exists <br />either as a simple sutfydrate (AgSH) or as a sim- <br />ple polymer HS-Ag-S-Ag-SH. Many studies have <br />shown that because of the possibility of binding <br />to colloids or through the formation of covalent <br />and other complexes, the toxicity of dissolved <br />silver ion in the environment is generally less <br />than that found in laboratory tests. <br />and local water quality characteristics are further <br />confounding factors in the application of labora- <br />tory results to field situations. <br />It is worth reiterating that the source of the silver <br />ion used in these studies was generaily derived <br />from the readily solubie silver nitrate (AgNO3) <br />which dissociates completely and gives essen- <br />tially free siiver ion. <br />In contrast to the situation found in most labora- <br />tory studies, Hogstrand and Wood (1998) note <br />that only a sma41 proportion of total dissolved sil- <br />ver in natural waters, <40%, exists in the free <br />form, and very often wiil be much less. <br />In studies where the silver ion was derived from <br />silver salts that are insoluble, such as silver thi- <br />osulfate A92(S203) and silver chloride (AgCI), the <br />toxicity decreased significantly as the solubility <br />decreased. No studies have been reported for <br />silver iodide, presumably due to its insolubility. <br />For silver chloride, for example, the 96-hr LC5o <br />was reported as > 100 Ng/L (Wood et al. 1996). <br />LeBlanc et al. (1984) reported that for fathead <br />minnows, silver ion was 300 times more toxic <br />than silver chloride, 15,000 Emes more toxic than <br />silver suifide and 17,500 fimes more toxic that <br />the silver thiosulfate compiex. <br />Similar results were found by Hogstrand et al. <br />(1996), who also reported that toxicity decreased <br />as hardness was increased from 50 to 250 mg <br />CaCO31L. Increasing concentrations of humic <br />acid were also found to decrease silver ion toxic- <br />ity, as noted elsewhere in this review. <br />It has recentiy been shown by Bianchini et al. <br />(2002), Bowles et a/. (2002) and others, that re- <br />active suMdes occur at concentrations ranging <br />from picorrwiar to nanomolar concentrations in <br />natural oxygenated waters. These concentra- <br />tions are sufident to strongly bind soft metals <br />auch as Ap(I) (BovAes et aL 2002). <br />Bianchini et al. (2002) have observed fhat these <br />reactive sulfirdes probabty aa:ount for the fact <br />that waterbome chronic silver toxicity has never <br />been shown for natural fleki situations. <br />Attempts to extrapolate current laboratory results <br />to fleld sites where siNer is found have resulted <br />in extremely low reyulatory limits (Karen et al. <br />1999). Differences in laboratory test methods <br />From time to time silver toxicity studies have <br />been attempted using the insoluble siNer saits, <br />but the researchers had to resort to indirect <br />methods to achieve the desired silver salYs con- <br />centration, see for example, Wood et al. (1996). <br />A number of researchers investigatlng the toxicity <br />of insoluble silver salts have attempted to circum- <br />veM the problem of the very low solubility by pre- <br />paring tlhe required silver salt in solutlon by <br />chemicat reaction prior to toxicity testing. For ex- <br />ample, adding silver nitrate to a solutwn of so- <br />dium chloride to produce silver chloride. <br />This oveiiooks the fact that these anions, often in <br />some excess, will aet to reduce the available stl- <br />ver ion concentration in solution (Ksp) leading to <br />AgCI (precipitate) and or may produce a silver <br />- Scientifk Papers -