Laserfiche WebLink
COI.ORADO c a+a <br />? '.. ya <br />cevnarawNn oF Statewide WaTer Supply Initintive ? <br />NATLTItAL q?;F ' <br />RFSCXJRCGS <br />Attachment 1 <br />Update on Municipal, <br />Agricultural Demand <br />Industrial and <br />Forecasts <br />March 2004 <br />Municipal and Industrial (M&I) Demand Forecasts <br />Preliminary M&I demand forecasts have been prepared based on projected <br />population growth. The baseline preliminary forecast initially assumed that water use <br />patterns (i.e.; per capita water use) will remain constant through 2030. Finalizing the <br />M&I demand forecast will include the reduction of per capita demands for fuiure <br />growth by approximately 5- 6% to reflect the future impacts of the National Energy <br />Policy Act of 1992. This act set manufaciuring standards for improved water <br />efficiency for toilets, urinals, showerheads and faucets. These standards became <br />effective in 1994. The standards for commercial fixtures became effective in 1997. <br />These standards affect the types of water using fixtures available for new construction <br />as well as remodeled or renovated facilities. As a result, future per capita demands <br />will decrease from the 2000 baseline demand. An additional adjustment to the <br />baseline demand will include the addition of expected water demands related to the <br />additional power generation needed to pxovide electricity ta the increased <br />population. <br />The revised baseline M&I demand forecasts will be bracketed by developing <br />reasonably probable high and low water demand forecasts. The high water demand <br />forecast will include population growth greater than the State Demographer's <br />projection and estimates of higher per capita water use related to more industrial and <br />other non-residential water demands as a percentage of future water use compared to <br />the baseline water use forecast. The low water demand forecast will include lower <br />than projected population growth and estimates of lower per capita water use related <br />to less industrial and other non-residential water use as a percentage of future water <br />use. <br />Many water providers have indicated that they will implement additional water <br />conservation practices to reduce future demands. An estimate of the potential <br />impacts of the increased implementation of water conservation practices currently <br />employed in Colorado will be made and catalogued as short term options to meet <br />future demands. These conservation practices include increasing block rate water <br />pricing, landscape regulations favoring low water using plants, and conservation <br />incentives such as rebates for irrigation controllers and high efficiency clothes <br />washers. Other water conservation measures that are not in common use in Colorado <br />DRAFT <br />? <br />• <br />• <br />S:Wieetin95\CWCB Board\Demantl Forecasts memo to CWCB 317-04 meeting-revised.doc