My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
EIS Arapahoe & Roosevelt National Forest, Pawnee National Grassland
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
EIS Arapahoe & Roosevelt National Forest, Pawnee National Grassland
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:38:28 PM
Creation date
6/15/2009 11:45:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.250
Description
Water Issues
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Author
USDA, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region
Title
EIS Arapahoe & Roosevelt National Forest, Pawnee National Grassland
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
?- Chapter 3- Affected Environmeni and Consequences <br />j ? <br />? <br />Effects from Range Management - Livestock grazing can, depending on management system <br />3 and number of livestock, affect water qualiry. The ioss af streambank protection can increase <br />? temperatures, reducing habitat for aquatic species. Also, efffuent in the form of fecat coliform <br />? above State Water Quality Standards can result due to long-term overgrazing of riparian and <br />? streamside zones. <br /> Healthy riparian zones and streambank vegetation are also important to maintaining the integrity <br />? of fluvial systems, water quality and aquatic habitat. Channel instability can be an adverse effect <br />1 of Iong-term livestock overgrazing of the r+parian zone. Effects of this can also include, with <br />' varying degrees, reduced vigor and density of riparian vegetation, and decreasing the ability of <br /> vegetation to stabilize the banks. Also, long-term grazing can result in streambank trampling, <br />? which can affect channel stability. With the loss of stable streambanks, habitat for aquatic <br />? species is diminished. <br />? Direct effects of any of the alternatives will include utilization of plants by domestic livestock, <br />? pr+marily cattle and sheep. The effects on vegetation differ by type of domestic livestock, but for <br /> this analysis these differences are not considered. The effects will vary by alternative due to <br />? differences in numbers of livestock. Implementation of Alternative A will have the highest risk of <br />? adversely affecting the water resource. This altemative a(lows iivestack grazing to continue at <br /> current levels and existing risks to water quality, stream and watershed health will continue. <br />? <br />? Alternatives B, C, D, and F project slight(y lower levefs of grazing to occur than Aiternative E, A, <br />i <br />i <br /> lar to <br />m <br />and G. In each of these alternatives, potential adverse effects to the water resources is s <br />? those under Altematives E, A, and G, but slightly reduced numbers may allow for some changes <br />? in management of the individual alloiments which would reduce risks of adverse effects to the <br /> stream and watershed potential, and water quality. <br /> <br />? Implementatian of Altemative F would have the fewest impacts associated with livestock <br /> grazing. <br />? Effects from Recreation Management - The effects of recreation on the watershed and <br />? surface water resources can be simi(ar to some effects of livestock grazing. Many camping sites, <br />? both dispersed and developed, are near lakes, reservoirs and streams. Although these are <br />? desirable locations, repeated use can reduce the health and vigor of riparian vegetation, <br />k <br />i <br />b <br />' <br /> an <br />n stream <br />s ability to mainta <br />compact soils, both of which can reduce the riparian vegetation <br />? stability and increase sedimentation. <br />? Soil compaction is caused by the weight of vehicles and animals on the ground. Soil compaction <br />? impairs infiltration and plant growth. It is generally more severe on moist or clayey soils and with <br />? more traffic. <br />? Erosion and sediment are caused by disturbing soil and concentrating runoff. Excess sediment <br /> impairs aquatic habitat. It is usually more severe when disturbances occur near streams or on <br />? unstable or highly erodible soils. <br />S Stream bank damage is caused by foot and wheeled traffic. Overhanging banks can be crushed <br />? and large amounts of sediment added directly to streams, with resulting damage to aquatic <br />? habitat. Bank damage is more severe where animals and people concentrate along streams. <br />? Wetland-riparian damage occurs mostly as ruts and puddles caused by foot and wheeled traffic. <br />? Surface and subsurface drainage is changed and plant growth may be impaired. <br /> In general, these effects are minimal except at points of concentrated use. Specific problems are <br /> identified and managed at project level analysis. <br />? <br />? <br /> Routi Natlonal Forest - E!S (WateNRlpar?an/Wetlands) 3-49
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.