My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Options for Creating a Land Interest Holding Entity
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Options for Creating a Land Interest Holding Entity
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:38:00 PM
Creation date
6/9/2009 3:32:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.300
Description
Land Issues
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
10/30/2000
Author
Conservation Partners, Inc.
Title
Options for Creating a Land Interest Holding Entity
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. May be more risky and less predictable than working with an existing, <br />known entity. <br />2. Establish a New Federal Public Corparation <br />A new federaily chartered non-profit corporation, similar to NFWF or the <br />Presidio Trust, could be created. 5uch an effort would require federai <br />authorizing legislatian, but could create an entity tailared to the specific <br />circurxtstances of the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program. A <br />baard of directors could gavern the new federal public corporation with <br />representative membership and appointment procedures tailored to the <br />Program. A contract between the new corporation and the Program <br />signatvries could assign the corporation whatever role is desired, including <br />holding interests in land, negotiating land deals, rnanaging land, and <br />contracting with other organizations to accomplish implementation <br />objectives. <br />Advantages <br />1. A new organization could be taiiared to the specifics of the Program <br />and federal, state and stakeholder interests could all be involved. <br />2. Could have a single purpose orientation <br />3. Could be constructed to have significant local involvement if desired. <br />4. No history or preconceived notions to overcQme <br />5. Federal and state agencies have a history of working with this type of <br />oxganization. <br />6. Can engage in fundraising activities ta suppiement government tunds. <br />7. L'zability issues can be addressed legislatively. <br />Disadvantages <br />1. Requires establishing a new organization and specific Eederal <br />authorizing legisiation for zts creation. <br />2. A new organization has no staff, operating history or relationships <br />with other conservation or management organizations. <br />3_ The relationship to the federal government maV invite suspicion that <br />federal goals will be given greater weight than concerns of other <br />participants. <br />4. May be more risky and less predictable than working with an existing, <br />knawn entity. <br />3. Create a Nonprofit Subsidiaxy or Suppor#ing Fvundation of the <br />Nebraska Community Foundation or Other Nonprofi# <br />A new Nebraska nonprofit corporation could be estabiished as a"subsidiary" <br />(or, more precisely, a controlled affiliate) of the Nebraska Community <br />Conservation Purlners, Inc. P. 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.