My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRRIP Purposes and Overview Draft (2)
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
PRRIP Purposes and Overview Draft (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:37:56 PM
Creation date
6/8/2009 1:29:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.350
Description
Legislation
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
11/29/2005
Author
DOI, Colorado, Wyoming, Nebraska
Title
PRRIP Purposes and Overview Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Colorado Water Conservation Board, the State and Division Engineers for Water <br />Division No. 4 and the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District today entered <br />into an agreement resolving the District's Recreational In-Channel Diversion ("RICD") <br />water rights for its whitewater park. "This historic agreement recognizes the importance <br />of recreation while promoting maximum utilization of Colorado's water resources," said <br />Russell George, executive director of the Department of Natural Resources. "We are <br />pleased that the CWCB and our Board have been able to put aside their differences and <br />concentrate their efforts on reaching a mutually acceptable compromise," Karen Shirley, <br />Director of the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District ("UGRWCD"). The <br />settlement reduces the flow amounts for several time periods from the amounts originally <br />sought and includes a sophisticated trigger whereby the UGRWCD will not call for the <br />RICD when the Gunnison Tunnel and Redlands Canal water rights are calling for, or <br />could call for, their water rights. <br />The District was one of the first applicants for an RICD water right after the passage of <br />Senate Bi1101-216, in 2001. Senate Bill 01-216 provided authorized certain local <br />governmental entities to obtain RICD water rights for the "minimum stream flow for a <br />reasonable recreational experience" and also provided that entities comply with certain <br />specified analytical burdens. The water court granted a water right to the District, and the <br />CWCB appealed the decision to the Colorado Supreme Court. The Supreme Court <br />reversed and remanded the matter back to the water court with instructions to remand the <br />matter back to the CWCB. The CWCB was set to consider the matter in January, but this <br />settlement resolves this matter with the exception of the Uncompahgre River Water Users <br />Association, who has only been monitoring the case. <br />"We couldn't be more pleased with the settlement of this matter. The reduced flow rates <br />and sophisticated trigger language allowed the CWCB to support this win-win solution <br />for recreational users and for future generations of traditional water users," stated Rod <br />Kuharich, Director of the CWCB. Bill Trampe, President of the UGRWCD said: "We <br />are ecstatic that the CWCB and or District have been able to reach final resolution. The <br />UGRWCD will be able to protect this instream resource through this water right decree. <br />The people of the State of Colorado and the citizens within the UGRWCD will be better <br />off for our ability to wrestle with these tough issues without giving up on negotiations." <br />Keith Catlin, the CWCB representative from the Gunnison River Basin agreed: "The <br />taxpaying citizens of Colorado and the UGRWCD are the winners in this settlement that <br />strikes an appropriate balance for recreational and traditional diversionary interests." <br />This settlement will be finalized in the upcoming days, and presented to the Water Judge <br />for Water Division No. 4 for his approval. The parties anticipate that the Water Judge <br />will approve the settlement without any controversy.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.