Laserfiche WebLink
for environmental purposes, including without limitation: statutory and regulatory <br />reform; granting of any necessary water rights; and water accounting systems. <br />Accounting and tracking of Program water to and through the associated habitats <br />will be implemented beginning Year 1 of the Program. <br />F. Evaluation of First Increment and Development of Subsequent Increments I <br />1. Evaluation of Effectiveness of the First Increment and Review of Goals, <br />Objectives, Activities and Criteria. <br />At least three years before the end of the First Increment, the Governance <br />Committee will develop a process and timeframe for evaluating the First <br />Increment. The evaluation process will take into account the need for FWS to <br />carry out independent ESA assessments, for NEPA compliance, and other <br />statutory obligations for a second Program increment. These evaluations will <br />include, but are not limited to the following: (1) consideration of information <br />gained through the Integrated Monitoring and Research Plan and experience; (2) <br />the judgment of habitat managers, field biologists, and independent experts; and <br />(3) the results of any peer review. The purpose of these evaluations is to weigh <br />whether Program goals, objectives, activities, and criteria should be modified or <br />should continue unchanged. The Program evaluations performed by the <br />Governance Committee will be coordinated with the FWS reviews undertaken as <br />part of its statutory obligations under the ESA. <br />2. Definition of Second Increment Components and Term. <br />Before expiration of the First Increment, the Governance Committee will identify <br />goals, objectives, activities and criteria, and milestones or other measures for ESA <br />compliance for a second Program increment. Independent peer review will be <br />used as appropriate pursuant to the Scientific Peer Review Guidelines in the <br />Program Adaptive Management Plan (Attachment 3, Appendix %A) to review <br />pertinent scientific data relating to the selection or implementation of specialized <br />recovery tasks or the development of technical milestones. If the Governance <br />Committee decides to recommend that the DOI-Department of the Interior and <br />three states enter into an agreement for a second increment, the Governance <br />Committee will develop proposed program documents. <br />One area of further research and analvsis bv the National Academy of Sciences, <br />the Forest Service and others during the first increment is the relationship between <br />forest condition and water yield. The Forest Service has made certain <br />commitments as further described in Attachment A to the Federal depletions plan. <br />If the results of the analyses of the impacts of post-1997 changes in forest <br />condition on water yield from forested lands located within the Platte River Basin, <br />as described in Attachment A to the Federal depletions plan, indicate a reduction <br />in such water vield has occurred and may persist into the second increment, the <br />Governance Committee shall discuss and fully consider such reductions, if anv, <br />Septe ibei?7November 4729 2005 Program Document 20 1