My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Tamarack Negotiation with Boulder/Centennial
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Tamarack Negotiation with Boulder/Centennial
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:37:47 PM
Creation date
6/8/2009 10:31:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8461.400
Description
SPWRAP
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/18/2008
Author
Steve Sims
Title
Tamarack Negotiation with Boulder/Centennial
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 1 <br />Ground Water Modeling Parameters for Recharge Wells <br />Water Court Case Comparison <br />DRAFT <br /> Water Court Case <br /> <br />Parameter <br />Unit Tamarack <br />96CW1063 & <br />? <br />Dinsdale Brothers Inc. <br />Lower Logan Well Users Sedgwick County Lowline Ditch <br /> (01CW61 & 3CW194) (03CW208) Well Users Company <br /> 98CW463) <br />, . , <br />. (03CW209) (03CW94) <br /> <br />Streambed Leakance <br />feet/day- _ <br />20 1 .. <br />20 , - <br />20 <br />20 . <br />15 <br />Horizontal/Vertical Aquifer <br />unitless <br />10:1 4:1 shallow 4:1 upriver <br /> <br />Hydraulic Conductivity Ratio <br />8:1 deep <br />5:1 downriver 6:1 NR <br />MODFLOW Package Used to <br />n/a <br />Stream Package River Package and/or River Package and/or River Package and/or <br />Simulate South Platte River <br />Stream Package <br />Stream Package <br />Stream Package River Package <br /> All wells have URF's <br /> even if 95% of <br /> depletions are All well depletions Well depletions replaced <br />Other Restrictions n/a returned after the n/a replaced using URFs even using URFs even if "95% n/a <br /> first month of if "95% criteria" met. (Z) criteria" met. (2'3) <br /> pumping. (1) <br />Range of Well Distances feet 70 to 1500 125 to 700 65 to 500 15 to 230 350 to 1050 (4) <br /> <br />Notes: <br />n/a: Not applicable <br />NR: Not Reported <br />(1) Unit Response Functions (URFs) for wells located less than 900 feet from the stream are based on a streambed conductivity of 20 feet/day-foot. URF for wells located greater than <br />900 feet are based on the Glover Method or similar method. <br />(2) Depletions from wells located more than 1000 ft from river replaced using Glover Method or similar method. <br />(3) Two wells (out of seven total recharge wells) located very close to the river in a highly permeable zone were excepted from this restriction and to be treated as instantaneous diversior <br />(4) The well located 1050 ft from the river was also located within approximately 50 ft of a seepage drain; depletions lagged to both simultaneously. <br />a?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.