My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7850
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7850
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants.
Title
Yampa River Basin Recommended Alternatives, Detailed Feasibility Study
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Draft.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Introduction <br />"Yampa Participants" (a consortium of companies including Colorado-Ute Electric Association, <br />' Platte River Municipal Power Association, Salt River Agricultural Improvement and Power <br />District, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, and Utah International). <br />Ownership of all facilities and land, and operational responsibility was with the Colorado <br />Division of Wildlife (CDOW). Basic physical characteristics of the dam/reservoir as originally <br />constructed are presented in Table 1-1. <br />' The reservoir was developed with 8,310 acre-feet of standby cooling water storage for <br /> the Craig power plant and 5,390 acre-feet of recreation water storage of which approximately <br /> 3,000 acre-feet was below the outlet works as dead storage. Interim sedimentation has reduced <br /> this 13,700 acre-feet original storage volume to an estimated 13,000 acre-feet. In connection <br />' with the present study, the dam/reservoir dam plans and related reports were obtained from the <br /> CDOW and reviewed against the constructed conditions, as no official as-constructed plans are <br /> known to exist. The facilities appear to have been constructed essentially as designed and exist <br />' in a generally good physical condition less a normal amount of wear and tear. Construction <br /> records indicated only two events of notable significance which occurred during the original <br /> dam construction. The first was an instance of frozen soil in the embankment which was <br /> apparently resolved at the time it occurred. The second was excessive seepage at both the right <br /> and left abutment/embankment interfaces which required excavating, drilling and grouting. <br /> This seepage control program was judged successful. A minor, relatively stable clear flow is <br /> currently being experienced from the right abutment/embankment interface. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />Table 1-1 <br />Existing Elkhead Dam/Reservoir Characteristics <br />Inventory of Dams I.D. Number CO 00976 <br />State of Colorado I.D. Number C-1339A <br />Elevations <br />Crest 6,375 feet <br />Service Spillway Crest/Normal Maximum W.S. 6,365 feet <br />Primary Outlet, Intake Invert 6,333 feet <br />Primary Outlet, Outlet Invert 6,316 feet <br />Channel at Downstream End of Stilling Basin 6,295 feet <br />Reservoir Capacity at Normal Maximum W. S. 13,700 acre-feet <br />Spillway Capacity at Crest of Dam 16,000 cfs <br />Primary Features/Dimensions <br />1,160 foot long homogeneous earthf ill embankment with chimney drain <br />315 foot long 36-inch RCP primary outlet pipe <br />135 foot arch shaped service spillway crest with a 40 foot wide spillway chute <br />40-foot wide USBR Type III Stilling Basin <br />20-foot wide county road on crest <br />In addition to normal maintenance, repairs have been necessary over the years to the <br />hydraulic lines, air vent and gate operators, however, there have been no major physical <br />problems or any significant modifications to the area with the exception of the addition of <br />recreation facilities. Two items have been identified as needed modifications which should be <br />accomplished when the dam is raised; the spillway sidewalls should be higher to avoid <br />1-5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.