My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7850
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7850
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants.
Title
Yampa River Basin Recommended Alternatives, Detailed Feasibility Study
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Draft.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />Executive Summary <br />1 <br /> Future Conditions Without Project <br /> The demands used in this scenario reflect projected development conditions in the year <br /> 2040 and the scenario differs from the current conditions analysis only in this respect. The <br /> 2040 demands are believed to reflect an average annual basin water consumption of <br /> approximately 159,000 of/yr. <br />' The results of this model scenario show largely the same agricultural shortages as did the <br /> current conditions analysis. However, municipal water supply shortages appear in one dry <br /> <br />' year and industrial shortages (mainly to an assumed coal-gasification plant near Craig) are <br />frequent. Reservoir contents show greater drafting for water supply purposes, primarily from <br /> Stagecoach and Elkhead Reservoirs. <br />' Simulated flows at Maybell are substantially lower than those under current conditions, <br />especially in the late summer and fall. Occurrences of zero monthly flow below Maybell (an <br />imprecise but useful indicator of flow conditions) rise from 5 to 22. The median and dry-year <br />flows under this model scenario are also shown on Figure S-1. <br />Future Conditions With Project <br />The demands used in this scenario also reflect projected 2040 development conditions but <br />also include the simulated operation of an enlarged Elkhead Reservoir. The enlarged reservoir <br />was assumed to have a storage capacity of 44,900 of and to fill under a transferred conditional <br />storage right presently held by the River District for the California Park project. <br />' Two important reservoir operations assumptions reflected in this model scenario are: 1) <br />the transfer of the existing 9,000 of industrial pool in Stagecoach into the enlarged Elkhead <br />Reservoir and the reassignment of the Stagecoach pool to municipal uses, and 2) the release of <br />' up to 22,200 of/yr from the enlarged Elkhead to supplement low flows at Maybell. These flow <br />support releases were made using assumed minimum monthly flow targets as a release <br />criterion; in most cases these releases were made in the late summer and fall. <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />The results of this model scenario show largely the same agricultural shortages as did the <br />current conditions analysis; agricultural demands were not assumed to have any new contracts <br />for water from the enlarged Elkhead (only some of those on the mainstem Yampa could benefit <br />anyway). The infrequent future municipal shortages are eliminated by deliveries made from <br />the reassigned pool in Stagecoach. Industrial shortages of up 2,240 of/yr at the assumed coal- <br />gasification plant near Craig will remain unless modifications are made to existing water <br />storage agreements to make those supplies available; if this were done, these industrial <br />shortages would also be eliminated. Stagecoach Reservoir is drafted less in this scenario as <br />industrial supplies are drawn mainly from Elkhead. The enlarged Elkhead is drawn upon <br />regularly for industrial use and instream flow support, though drawdown by Labor Day <br />weekend would be less than 10 feet on the average. <br />Simulated flows at Maybell are generally higher than those under "future without <br />project" conditions though still somewhat lower than under current conditions. The median <br />flows equal or exceed the values in the preliminary flow recommendations. Late season flows <br />S-5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.