Laserfiche WebLink
Mitigation and Modification Alternatives <br />• Sufficient pool volume and pool residency time for the number of fish expected. <br />• Operation over the proper flow range during the appropriate time period (migration <br />periods). <br />• Unobstructed navigation path of concentrated flow (for aesthetic; low flow and <br />attraction flow purposes). <br />Design criteria which evolve from these characteristics include: <br />-" • Fishway consisting of a sloped drop followed by a slower velocity run (versus a <br /> pool). <br /> • Fishway with one or more stages (12 max) not exceeding one foot drop per stage. <br /> • Watercraft navigation capability and structural stability at all normal flow rates. <br /> • Fishway located as close as possible to the most upstream point of the diversion <br /> structure. <br /> • Minimum run dimension of 4' deep by 10' long and wide; with a velocity not <br /> exceeding 8 ft/second at flow rates between 10 and 150 cubic feet per second. <br /> • Fishway contains the majority of instream flow passing the structure at average <br /> annual low flows. <br /> • A staging area at the base of the fishway with a minimum depth of 4 feet and an <br /> attractor velocity of 4 to 8 feet per second. <br /> • Minimum flow depth through fishway of 1 foot. <br /> These design parameters are based upon limited knowledge of the Colorado Squawfish <br /> and upon fishways developed for other similar fish species about which more information is <br /> available. In particular the following Colorado Squawfish characteristics are important to note: <br /> • Upstream migration occurs in a mid-July through August time frame and consists <br /> primarily of fish from 500-700 mm in length. <br /> • The potential number of fish to be provided for in passage is unknown due to their <br /> low population density. <br /> • Their swimming characteristics are believed to be much the same as the Northern <br /> Pike, White Sucker, Flannelmouth Sucker and the Roundtail Chub, all of which <br /> successfully navigate the City of Craig diversion structure. <br />CONSTRUCTION COSTS <br />For the purpose of establishing the general magnitude of costs associated with diversion <br />structure modifications, conceptual-level cost estimates (January, 1995) were prepared for <br />4-11