My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7886
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:43:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7886
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants.
Title
Yampa River Basin Recommended Alternative, Detailed Feasibility Study
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Reservoir Operating Studies ' <br />Instream Flow Conditions <br />Flow conditions below Stagecoach and Steamboat Lake are similar to the "without <br />project" case. Flows below Stagecoach reflect the winter releases for power and environmental <br />purposes and are relatively stable throughout the non-runoff season. Flows below Steamboat <br />Lake reflect seasonal spilling from a full reservoir and no minimum release operation. ' <br />Flows below the enlarged Elkhead Reservoir are dramatically different from previous <br />scenarios. The effect of the operation of the enlarged reservoir is to shift the outflow <br />hydrograph towards the late summer and early fall months when releases are made help meet <br />flow targets at Maybell. Peak flows during April through June are lower as runoff is capture <br />and the enlarged reservoir fills. Figure 2-4 presents a comparison of average monthly flows in <br />Elkhead Creek downstream of the reservoir under 2040 demand conditions with and without , <br />the project. <br />Flows at Maybell are similarly affected by the enlargement of Elkhead Reservoir. As <br />shown in Table 2-9, flow support releases from the enlarged Elkhead Reservoir increase late <br />summer and fall flows to values greater than or equal to the defined flow targets (Table 2-8). <br />In the month of September, median flows with project operation are 200 cfs. This is ' <br />significantly greater than flows under current potential conditions (112 cfs) and under the 2040 <br />"without project" case (61 cfs). In fact, the flow support release strategy is able to achieve a <br />median flow regime equal to the preliminary flow recommendations in all months except July. , <br />More noteworthy, however, are the improvements in dry years (75th percentile flows). <br />The flow support strategy achieves a September flow of 200 cfs versus 44 cfs under current <br />potential conditions and 6 cfs under the 2040 "without project" case. <br /> Table 2-9 <br />Modeled Flows at Maybell at Projected 2040 Demand Level With Project (cfs) <br />Month 25% exc. 50% ex c. 75% gxc. <br />October 276 204 204 <br />November 332 255 223 <br />December 303 228 175 ' <br />January 269 217 164 <br />February 310 256 218 <br />March 669 498 363 <br /> <br />April <br />2,840 1,869 <br />1,147 ' <br />May 6,810 5,666 3,764 <br />June 6,312 5,103 3,585 <br />July 1,693 938 401 <br />August 328 220 220 <br />September 200 200 200 <br /> <br />During the spring and early summer months, flows in the Yampa River at Maybell are <br />less than "without project" operation. This is a result of the additional water storage capacity <br />of the enlarged Elkhead Reservoir and the fact that the reservoir is typically drawn down over <br />the fall and winter months to make flow support releases. However, these reductions in <br /> <br /> 2-22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.