My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7886
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7886
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:43:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7886
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants.
Title
Yampa River Basin Recommended Alternative, Detailed Feasibility Study
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Final Report.
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
299
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Reservoir Operating Studies <br />FINAL OPERATIONS STUDIES FOR THE ENLARGED ELKHEAD RESERVOIR <br />The final reservoir operations studies made using the Yampa River basin model <br />considered three basic scenarios: 1) current potential conditions, 2) year 2040 conditions <br />without the reservoir enlargement, and 3) year 2040 conditions -wiW the reservoir enlargement. <br />Several mainstem flow enhancement options were also examined under the latter scenario. <br />These various scenarios were defined so as to characterize the full range of likely water <br />management futures in the basin and to permit the with/without comparisons necessary for <br />environmental and biological assessments of the enlargement project. The key assumptions and <br />results of these groups of model scenarios are presented below. Detailed tables of scenario <br />results can be found in Appendices E, F, and G. <br />Current Potential Conditions Scenario <br />Assumptions <br />This scenario represents the hydrologic conditions that would ensue if current potential <br />demands were active over the entire 53-year study period and if existing reservoirs were <br />operated according to contracts and agreements presently in place. It is = a "no action" <br />scenario since water demands will change in the future even without development of additional <br />water storage or other changes in basin water management. Rather, it represents a "baseline" <br />that facilitates the characterization of future hydrologic conditions as differences from actual <br />present conditions. In terms of water demands it reflects a smaller amount of depletion than <br />does the "current potential conditions with consulted depletions" scenario used to develop the <br />preliminary flow recommendations at Maybell. <br />Water demands in this scenario are met using existing direct flow water rights and, if <br />necessary, storage deliveries from the reservoirs. All reservoirs are represented at their present <br />capacities. There is no mainstem instream flow right in place nor are there any reservoir <br />operations to enhance mainstem flows at any locations. <br />Scenario Results <br />Water Deliveries <br />Water shortages to demands occur in 34 of the 53 years of the study period in this <br />scenario. However, all of these shortages are to agricultural demands, many of them on small <br />tributaries, that have no storage supplies. The average annual total shortage is 917 of and the <br />maximum annual total shortage is 11,773 of occurring in 1934. <br />Reservoir Levels <br />There is very little use of reservoir storage in this scenario because the demands with <br />storage contracts can be met from direct flow supplies in all but the driest years. Figure 2-1 <br />shows the end-of-month contents of the three modeled existing reservoirs. As can be seen, <br />there is little draft for water supply purposes except in the dry periods of the 1930's, `50's, and <br />`70's. The regular annual cycles that are evident are the result of evaporation and, in the <br />2-12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.