Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> CHAPTER 2 <br /> <br /> RESERVOIR OPERATING STUDIES <br /> <br /> This chapter describes the reservoir operating studies conducted as part of the present <br /> study. These operating studies were accomplished using a computer model of the Yampa River <br />basin and were done in several phases as the study progressed. The discussion below first <br /> presents an overview of these phases and then describes the basin computer model used to <br /> perform the operations studies. A brief description of two phases of the earlier studies is then <br />presented. The chapter concludes with a detailed discussion of the final operating studies <br /> which are also presented in the Preliminary Biological and Environmental Assessments. <br /> <br /> OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS STUDIES <br /> The conclusions of the Phase I Study included a recommendation to move forward with <br /> the conversion of a portion of the Juniper Project water rights to an instrearn flow water right <br /> for the benefit of the endangered fishes and the present study began with this objective in mind. <br /> The initial administrative and operational concept underlying this conversion was to make <br /> releases from the enlarged Elkhead Reservoir to alleviate water supply shortages caused by the <br /> "call" of the relatively senior Juniper-based instrearn flow right located at Juniper Canyon. <br /> However, consideration of the existing subordination of the Juniper rights led to modification <br /> of this concept to one of subordinating the instrearn flow right to upstream junior depletion and <br /> then making augmentation releases from the enlarged Elkhead Reservoir to achieve the <br /> instrearn flow levels that would have been realized in Juniper Canyon with an unubordinated <br /> instrearn flow water right. From the standpoint of modeled physical hydrology these two <br /> operations are indistinguishable, i.e., the amount of storage water released is the same in either <br /> case. <br /> However, it became evident as the study progressed that the terms of existing transfers <br /> and subordination of the Juniper rights, along with concern related to protection of <br /> Colorado's compact entitlements, may make it difficult to obtain and administer a subordinated <br /> Juniper-based instrearn flow water right. Accordingly, the Colorado River Water Conservation <br /> District ("River District") .and the Colorado Water Conservation Board ("CWCB") began <br /> negotiation for a Memorandum of Understanding that contemplated the development of an <br /> overall Yampa River Basin Water Management Plan. This water management plan would <br /> include contractual agreements for intream flow enhancement from releases of stored water <br />and new instrearn flow water rights to protect natural flow and storage releases through the <br /> river reaches of interest. Under the plan, comparable instrearn flow benefits could be realized <br /> without the difficult conversion and administration of a Juniper-based instream flow right. <br />The operating studies conducted during the present study reflect this evolution in thinking <br />about how to best obtain and protect instrearn flows. Initial studies focused on quantification of <br />the contemplated draft of the Juniper rights and on the possible reservoir storage and operations <br />necessary to either mitigate shortages caused by the Juniper-based intream flow "call" or to <br />supplement flows obtained through a subordinated instrearn right. For comparison, another <br />2-1