My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7640
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:42:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7640
Author
Helbig, V.
Title
Yampa River Spawning Habitat Investigations.
USFW Year
1984.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The results of the habitat simulations are presented in Tables 2 <br />and 3. <br />Appendix 2, consistent with spawning windows (approximately June <br />15 - August 15) presented in Table 1, shows mean monthly flows in <br />June, July and August for 62 pears of record. Appendix 3 depicts <br />habitat availability or weighted useable area (WUA) for June, <br />July and August for 62 years of record. <br />Discussion• <br />As seen in Table 1, the time frame for spawning activity on the <br />Yampa River varies somewhat from year to year. Why this occurs <br />is not fully understood at this time. Whether a function of <br />photoperiod, flow, water tempertaure, sexual maturation or a <br />combination of one or more factors remains unclear. What is <br />evident, is the annual need for a sufficient surge or peak spring <br />run-off flow such that movement of fines (sand/silt) is <br />accomplished to maintain spawning substrates. <br />Colorado squawfish spawning activity is apparently composed of <br />two phases requiring two distinct habitat types: deposition! <br />fertilization and staging/resting areas. As is illustrated in <br />Appendix 1, each phase has different depth, velocity, and <br />substrate characteristics. Table 2 depicts WUA for both <br />functions at RM 16.5. Table 3 shows WUA for deposition/ <br />fertilization only since little or no staging/resting habitat <br />occurs within the study site at RM I8.5. <br />As is apparent from Tables 2 and 3, WUA for deposition/ <br />fertilization at both study-sites and WUA for staging/resting at <br />RM 16.5 is optimized at 700 cubic feet/second (cfs). When <br />compared to the historic flow of record for the Yampa River <br />(Appendix 2), 700 cfs is exceeded 98.4% of the time in June, <br />75.8% of the time in July, and 13% of the time in August. <br />While a flow of 700 cfs optimized WUA at 22,726 sq.f t./1000 f t. <br />of linear stream at RM 16.5, a 90% habitat retention level could <br />be attained for deposition/fertilization at an approximate range <br />of flows from 350-1100 cfs. For staginglresting the 90% <br />retention level for WUA could be maintained at approximately 300- <br />1500 cfs. Referring to Appendix 3 (WUA for the period of <br />record); at RM 16.5, 90% of optimum WUA occurred only one time in <br />June (limited occurrence primarily because of much higher flows), <br />18 times in July and 35 times in August for 62 years of record. <br />At the replicate site (RM 18.5), 700 cfs resulted in an optimum <br />WUA for deposition/fertilization of 15,230 sq.ft. /I000 ft. of <br />linear stream; 90% of optimum WUA could be maintained within a <br />range of approximately 400-1700 cfs. For the historic period of <br />record (Appendix 3), 90% of optimum WUA occurred at RM 18.5, one <br />time in June (again because of high flows), 36 times in July and <br />35 times in August. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.