My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8270
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8270
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:42:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8270
Author
Hayse, J. W., S. F. Daly, A. Tuthill, R. A. Valdez, B. Cowdell and G. Burton.
Title
Effect of Daily Fluctuations from Flaming Gorge Dam on Ice Processes in the Green River.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
ANL/EA/RP-102041,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 DISCUSSION <br />This study was a detailed investigation of the ice processes on the Green River <br />downstream of Flaming Gorge Dam. The overall goal of the study was to assess the influence of <br />the daily release schedule of Flaming Gorge Dam on the river ice processes in the study reach in <br />order to evaluate the potential for impacts to overwintering endangered fish. The first step was <br />to analyze historical measurements of water temperature, air temperature, and ice observations. <br />The water temperature entering the study reach near the Jensen gage and just upstream of the <br />Chew Bridge was often at 0 °C during the winter, and the daily average air temperatures were <br />consistently below 0 °C throughout December, January, and most of February. Ice was observed <br />in the Green River study reach during every winter for which reliable records were available. <br />The USGS observations of ice, made in conjunction with retrieval of discharge measurements <br />from the Jensen gage, were confounded by the retrieval schedule and were not reliable indicators <br />of ice presence. <br />Formation of ice cover in the Green River study reach followed a consistent pattern each <br />winter for which records were available and the daily release schedule of Flaming Gorge Dam, <br />whether steady or fluctuating as a result of hydropower demand, did not appear to affect the basic <br />outline of this pattern (Table 11). The initial ice observed each winter was frazil ice, transported <br />at the water surface in the form of slush, floes, and pancake ice. A stationary ice cover formed <br />initially near the Ouray Bridge and then progressed upstream. The ice cover was formed <br />primarily by the juxtaposition of floes up to RM 290. Underturning of ice floes and a rougher ice <br />surface seem to be more typical upstream of this point. The upstream extent of the ice cover was <br />typically reported to be at least RM 302 and often extended upstream of this point. No ice cover <br />progression has been reported between Chew Bridge (RM 316) and Split Mountain, except for <br />short, isolated stretches during a particularly severe winter, probably as a result of the steeper <br />gradient between Chew Bridge and the downstream end of Split Mountain. <br />Analysis of the 1997 field survey data and modeling of hydraulic conditions indicated <br />that daily fluctuations in releases from Flaming Gorge Dam have only a small effect on the <br />hydraulic conditions in the Green River downstream of RM 300 (Jensen Bridge). Consequently, <br />daily fluctuations are unlikely to significantly affect the formation or breakup of ice covers <br />further downstream. The results indicated that the fluctuations would be more pronounced and <br />could affect the formation and breakup of ice cover upstream of RM 300. <br />The general trend of ice cover formation in the Green River can be outlined based upon <br />historical observations, the 1996-97 field surveys, and the historical water and air temperature <br />data. First, construction of Flaming Gorge Dam undoubtedly had an influence on the ice regime <br />downstream of the dam. A primary influence of the dam was to increase the river water <br />temperature immediately downstream of the dam during winter. Winter stratification of the <br />reservoir causes colder, less dense water to overlay warmer, more dense water (pure water is <br />-22-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.