Laserfiche WebLink
The unsteady flow sub-model used continuity and momentum equations to describe river <br />flow in finite difference form. The model solved these equations for each river cross section <br />through multiple time steps. The model used surveyed or estimated Green River geometry to <br />calculate discharge and stage at multiple cross sections of the river as a function of time, using <br />the observed upstream discharge as input. The model was calibrated to match the water surface <br />response to each alternate release schedule observed during the field survey. <br />The UNET model was also modified to incorporate the dynamic formation of river ice <br />covers as determined by the ice cover progression sub-model. The ice cover progression <br />sub-model (Section 2.4.3) predicts the sections of the channel in which a stationary floating ice <br />cover will form. The presence of a stationary ice cover in a section changes the hydraulic <br />properties of that section. These changes include reducing the cross-sectional area of the channel <br />available for flow, reducing the hydraulic radius of the channel cross section, and modifying the <br />effective channel roughness. These changes in the hydraulic properties in turn influence the <br />discharge and stage calculated by the unsteady flow sub-model. <br />2.4.1.1 Channel Geometry Data <br />FLO Engineering, Inc. provided 37 surveyed cross sections for the Green River in the <br />vicinity of the Ouray National Wildlife Refuge, between RM 248 and 265. These data were in <br />the format of the HEC-2 water-surface profile model (U. S. Army 1990) and were calibrated to <br />observed water levels at a measured flow of 15,500 cfs (FLO Engineering, Inc. 1996). <br />Additional surveyed cross-section data were obtained from the Bureau of Land Management <br />(BLM). These cross sections were also surveyed by FLO Engineering, Inc. in conjunction with <br />the Recovery Program's Channel Monitoring Program, and were located in areas between <br />RM 269 and 290 and in the vicinity of the Escalante Wetlands and Razorback Island (RM <br />305-312). The cross-sectional geometry for the remainder of the study reach was estimated from <br />USGS 1:24,000 scale, 10-ft contour interval topographic maps and from depth measurements <br />made during the 25-30 January 1997 field study. <br />2.4.1.2 Calibration of UNET Unsteady Flow Model <br />Calibration options for the UNET model include adjustments of the channel bed <br />roughness, the roughness of the ice cover and the ice cover thickness. In addition, the <br />hydrographs of water stage simulated by the UNET model can be calibrated by malting minor <br />changes in the conveyance and storage capacity of selected reaches of river. Conveyance (K) is <br />defined as: <br />1.49 2 <br />K= AR', <br />n <br />-11-