Laserfiche WebLink
8 <br />known-age larval series obtained from Willow Beach National Fish Hatchery <br />and published descriptions (Snyder, 1981). <br />Humpback chub. At this time, it is not possible to reliably separate <br />larval/juvenile stages of Gila either in the field or laboratory and <br />this problem is addressed in objective three. This project is designed <br />to evaluate three critical research areas relative to the humpback chub: <br />1. To evaluate the validity of standard morphomeristic techniques for <br />the differentiation of known (hatchery-reared) YOY/juvenile roundtails, <br />humpbacks, and bonytails. <br />2. To employ the results of (1) above for the identification of field <br />collected immature chubs. <br />3. To determine and describe any variation in physical habitat requirements <br />and other biotic associations for sympatric Gila spp. <br />In order to meet the first research need (above), known-age larval series <br />of humpbacks and bonytails have been obtained from Willow Beach National <br />Fish Hatchery (Arizona) and Dexter National Fish Hatchery (New Mexico). <br />Additionally, developmental series of six hybrid crosses have been <br />provided and will be evaluated i.e. <br />humpback x humpback - bonytail <br />bonytail x roundtail - bonytail <br />roundtail x bonytail <br />roundtail x roundtail - bonytail <br />humpback x bonytail <br />bonytail x humpback - bonytail <br />The original humpback chub brood stock was captured at Black Rocks. <br />Bonytail brood stock was from Lake Mojave, California. Unfortunately, <br />roundtail brood stock was captured at Black Rocks and was therefore <br />sympatric with humpback material. Therefore, we are attempting to <br />produce a developmental series from the Juniper Springs area of the <br />Yampa River and will also utilize a series from the White River (Rio <br />Blanco County). Since no historical humpback records exist for these <br />latter localities, we assume a high degree of genetic purity. <br />Standard morphomeristic techniques are described in Appendix B. Data <br />for each known developmental series will be statistically evaluated <br />to determine if key identification characters can be meaningfully determined. <br />Multivariate statistical testing will involve both principal components <br />and discriminant function analysis, following procedures employed by <br />Daly and Balling (1978), Davis and Baker (1974) and Smith et al. (1979)• <br />A differentiation of unknown field-collected Gila larvae into humpback, <br />roundtail, "intergrade" and/or "hybrid" will follow the laboratory phase <br />above and will be a function of the success of the laboratory research <br />and the degree of morphomeristic divergence of these closely-related species. <br />Similarly, the recognition of variation in habitat requirements will also _ <br />relate to laboratory findings. <br />