My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7934
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7934
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:40:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7934
Author
Hyra, R.
Title
Methods of Assessing Instream Flows for Recreation.
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
Instream Flow Information Paper No. 6,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
stream flow. These responses. to stream flow by different user groups ~~ <br />are the criteria which are basic to the methods introduced here. <br />The first method is called the single cross section approach. This <br />method is useful primarily for identifying flows below which a recrea- <br />tion activity is not 'feasible and results in a so called "minimum" flow <br />recommendation. <br />The second method is called the incremental method. With this <br />method the recreation planner is able to analyze various flows and <br />determine the recreation potential of a stream at different flows. <br />This paper is being distributed with four objectives in mind. <br />These are: <br />1. To bring the problem of preserving instream flows to the <br />attention of recreation agencies and the research community in <br />order to encourage more research in this vital and neglected <br />area. <br />2. To discuss the development of the recreation probability-of- <br />use curves and of recreation criteria in general, which are <br />necessary for quantifying instream water requirements for <br />recreation. <br />3. To obtain review and comment on the recreation criteria and <br />probability-of-use curves, and to request data which may be <br />used to test or improve the criteria or curves. <br />4. To describe the two approaches for assessing stream flows and <br />'discuss how various recreation planning processes can be <br />served by their application. <br />Both methods of instream flaw analysis discussed in this paper <br />utilize computer modeling techniques. Both approaches also require that <br />streamflow data be collected. The single cross section approach, as its <br />name implies, requires that information be collected at only one loca- <br />tion on the stream. The incremental method requires that data be col- <br />lected at multiple locations on the stream. In addition to cross <br />sectional data, ..data relating the streamflow parameters to recreation <br />potential are necessary. These data are termed recreation criteria. <br />Recreation criteria for instream flow methodologies are the rec- <br />reation activity information bases necessary to describe a relationship <br />between the quantity of water flowing in a stream, and the quantity and <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.