My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8247
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8247
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:40:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8247
Author
Hudson, J. M., K. W. Wilson, L. D. Lentsch and K. D. Christopherson.
Title
State of Utah Stocking Plan For Endangered Fish Species of the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1999.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, Utah.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LIST OF TABLES <br />Table 1. Summary of number of razorback suckers collected during ISMP: 1987-1996 <br />(McCada et al. 1994x, 1994b, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998; Day and Crosby 1996; <br />Brunson et a1. 1997) . ..............................................27 <br />Table 2. Summary of razorback sucker estimated population size, target adult population <br />size, and number of adults needed per river segment to reach the target (IlVIO) <br />value ...........................................................28 <br />Table 3. Hypothetical example of producing 130 mm vs. 275 mm razorback suckers <br />given limited facilities that can produce 10,000 kg of biomass per year. <br />According to these hypothetical figures, it would be more productive to stock <br />130 mm razorback suckers .......................................... 29 <br />Table 4. Summary of final recommendation for razorback suckers: age at time of <br />release, location of release, the number offish needed per year, and total mass <br />per year ................... .................................... 30 <br />Table 5. Timeframe to meet IMO levels of razorback suckers in the upper Colorado River <br />basin under final recommendation .................................... 31 <br />Table 6. Timeframe to meet IMO levels of bonytail in the upper Colorado River basin <br />under final recommendation ........................................ 32 <br />Table A-1. Summary of razorback sucker stocking alternatives: age at time of release, <br />location of release, the number of fish needed per year, and total mass per <br />year ............................................................37 <br />Table A-2. Timeframe to meet IMO levels of razorback suckers in the upper Colorado River <br />basin under stocking alternative 1 .................................... 39 <br />Table A-3. Timeframe to meet IMO levels of razorback suckers in the upper Colorado River <br />basin under stocking alternative 2 .................................... 40 <br />Table A-4. Timeframe to meet IMO levels of razorback suckers in the upper Colorado River <br />basin under stocking alternative 3 .................................... 41 <br />Table A-5. Timeframe to meet IMO levels of razorback suckers in the upper Colorado River <br />basin under stocking alternative 4 .................................... 42 <br />Table A-6. Timeframe to meet IMO levels of razorback suckers in the upper Colorado River <br />basin under stocking alternative 5 .................................... 43 <br />Table A-7. Timefi-ame to meet IMO levels of razorback suckers in the upper Colorado River _ <br />basin under stocking alternative 6 .................................... 44 <br />iv <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.