Laserfiche WebLink
Risk Assessment of Reintroduction and Augmentation <br />Releasing hatchery-reared fish into areas that are populated with wild fish is not without <br />risks. Potential risks associated with stocking have been identified (Busack 1990; Burdick 1992; <br />Ryden and Pfeifer 1994; Ryden 1997) and strategies outlinrd to minimize negative impacts on <br />wild razorback sucker populations. <br />Genetic <br />1. Outbreeding depression: outbreeding depression results in the loss of fitness from <br />crossing distantly related individuals. The Genetics Management Plan (Williamson <br />and Wydoski 1994, Czapla 1999) recommends using local populations first (Green <br />River stock), then nearest neighboring population (Colorado River stock), and lastly, <br />using broodstock from the Lake Mohave population. Following the Genetics <br />Management Plan protocol will reduce the risk of outbreeding. <br />2. Inbreeding depression: if razorback sucker stocked into the Green and Colorado rivers <br />are too closely related to each other and they reproduce in the wild, their progeny <br />could suffer detrimental effects (reduced fitness or death) from inbreeding. To reduce <br />the risk of inbreeding depression, the recommended target breeding strategy for <br />propagation of the endangered Colorado River fishes, as outlined in the Genetics <br />Management Plan (Williamson and Wydoski 1994; Czapla 1999), is to mate 25 <br />females with 25 males to produce 25 pedigreed family lots if sufficient adults are <br />available. An inbreeding rate of 1% is estimated for an effective population size of SO <br />fish which is acceptable for maintaining the genetic diversity of captive fish stocks <br />used as founders (Williamson and Wydoski 1994}. <br />3. Hybridization: increased numbers of razorback suckers may result in hybridization <br />with native flannehnouth and bluehead suckers and with nonnative white suckers. <br />This could lead to a loss of interspecific genetic identity. Flannelmouth and <br />razorback suckers hybridize in the wild (Huth et al. 1987) as do flannehnouth and <br />bluehead suckers (Ryden and Pfeifer 1995) but hybridization rates are low. Stocking <br />hatchery-reared razorback suckers is not expected to increase the rate of hybridization <br />between these species of native suckers (Burdick 1992). Flannelmouth and bluehead <br />suckers hybridize with the nonnative white sucker (Ryden and Pfeifer 1995; 1996a <br />and 1996b). Razorback sucker may also hybridize with white sucker. This is not <br />expected to be a significant problem. <br />Ecological <br />1. Pathogen and parasite transmission: pathogens and parasites (i.e., Asian tapeworm) <br />harbored by hatchery reared fish could adversely impact wild fish populations. A <br />resistant broodstock may transmit pathogens into wild populations, which may have <br />little or no resistance. To reduce the risk of pathogen and parasite transmission, <br />inspections are conducted by the Fisheries Experiment Station (UDWR) to ensure that <br />culture facilities and wild broodstock sources are specific pathogen free and meet the <br />requirements of the Fish Health Policy Board. Those facilities which are pathogen <br />free according to Hiles set forth by the Fish Health Board are given fish health <br />4 <br />